Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The scan result is not ideal #124

Open
kkellyk opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

The scan result is not ideal #124

kkellyk opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@kkellyk
Copy link

kkellyk commented Oct 21, 2022

Hi,
I use my own dataset.
A total of eight categories,
832 training datasets (104 per category) and 360 validation datasets (45 per category).

The result of the pretext:

The top result of the kNN evaluation is 67.5
Accuracy of top-10 nearest neighbors on train set is 67.9
Accuracy of top-5 nearest neighbors on val set is 76.83

The result of SCAN ACC=0.631, and The result of Self-label ACC=0.3

I used to change the Parameter of the Pretext:
Augmentations, batch size, features_dim, temperaturee
The results of the Pretext are about the same.

And change the Parameter of the SCAN:
batch size, entropy_weight, num_neighbors
I haven't seen a significant improvement.
What should I do to make the result better?

Thanks
Kelly

@kkellyk kkellyk changed the title The pretext result is not ideal The scan result is not ideal Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant