fix(deps): bump qs from 6.5.2 to 6.5.3

[dependabot]

Bumps qs from 6.5.2 to 6.5.3.

Changelog

Sourced from qs's changelog.

6.5.3

• [Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
• [Fix] utils.merge: avoid a crash with a null target and a truthy non-array source
• [Fix] correctly parse nested arrays
• [Fix] stringify: fix a crash with strictNullHandling and a custom filter/serializeDate (#279)
• [Fix] utils: merge: fix crash when source is a truthy primitive & no options are provided
• [Fix] when parseArrays is false, properly handle keys ending in []
• [Fix] fix for an impossible situation: when the formatter is called with a non-string value
• [Fix] utils.merge: avoid a crash with a null target and an array source
• [Refactor] utils: reduce observable [[Get]]s
• [Refactor] use cached Array.isArray
• [Refactor] stringify: Avoid arr = arr.concat(...), push to the existing instance (#269)
• [Refactor] parse: only need to reassign the var once
• [Robustness] stringify: avoid relying on a global undefined (#427)
• [readme] remove travis badge; add github actions/codecov badges; update URLs
• [Docs] Clean up license text so it’s properly detected as BSD-3-Clause
• [Docs] Clarify the need for "arrayLimit" option
• [meta] fix README.md (#399)
• [meta] add FUNDING.yml
• [actions] backport actions from main
• [Tests] always use String(x) over x.toString()
• [Tests] remove nonexistent tape option
• [Dev Deps] backport from main

Commits

• 298bfa5 v6.5.3
• ed0f5dc [Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
• 691e739 [Robustness] stringify: avoid relying on a global undefined (#427)
• 1072d57 [readme] remove travis badge; add github actions/codecov badges; update URLs
• 12ac1c4 [meta] fix README.md (#399)
• 0338716 [actions] backport actions from main
• 5639c20 Clean up license text so it’s properly detected as BSD-3-Clause
• 51b8a0b add FUNDING.yml
• 45f6759 [Fix] fix for an impossible situation: when the formatter is called with a no...
• f814a7f [Dev Deps] backport from main
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to add @GregoireF and @NicolasV as reviewers to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects/pulls/183/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 0 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : No Changes
Size       : +0 -0
Percentile : 0%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.lock : +0 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}