Working great, with privacy issues.

[clifford269]

The browser doesn't stand that strong against privacy tests. You could incorporate patches from other open projects. Firefox 115ESR does better on the tests (which btw looks like this on mine)

[clifford269]

Definitely not a bug.

[Zero3K]

1. What is that screenshot supposed to represent?
2. What privacy tests did you try?

[clifford269]

The screenshot was a subtle hint at the design possibilities.
I tried coveryourtracks.eff.org where my current firefox checks up the 2/3 tests.

[Zero3K]

Do you have any extensions installed in your Firefox installation?

[win32ss]

I am currently building up a --ungoogled-supermium switch used to invoke the equivalent of ungoogled-chromium core patches.

Supermium already has a switch to use a custom HTTP accept header (#http-accept-header), but I do agree that a lot more can be done, especially with the introduction of user agent client hints (Chromium-exclusive at this time) as no one seems to spoof those.

[clifford269]

Do you have any extensions installed in your Firefox installation?

Yeah, uBlock Origin is common across both (with concerns to privacy). Btw, Chrome is meant to be a data miner-not so much the case with FF.

[clifford269]

I am currently building up a --ungoogled-supermium switch used to invoke the equivalent of ungoogled-chromium core patches.

Supermium already has a switch to use a custom HTTP accept header (#http-accept-header), but I do agree that a lot more can be done, especially with the introduction of user agent client hints (Chromium-exclusive at this time) as no one seems to spoof those.

Yeah. Just smth out of context-do you have any linux development experience?