You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I use Cifar100 to train and test the ShuffleNetV2, but the accuracy I got is just 0.499, all the parameter setting is consistent with the provided in READMe, which are, init lr = 0.1 divide by 5 at 60th, 120th, 160th epochs, train for 200 epochs with batchsize 128 and weight decay 5e-4, Nesterov momentum of 0.9 (I have run 2 times on my end and 0.499 is the best accuracy).
Looking forword to anyone's reply, thanks a lot again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After repeated experiments, this code fails to achieve the described accuracy in the CIFAR100.
You can set a higher input size for training, which can achieve a higher accuracy.
Hello, thanks for code sharing.
I use Cifar100 to train and test the ShuffleNetV2, but the accuracy I got is just 0.499, all the parameter setting is consistent with the provided in READMe, which are, init lr = 0.1 divide by 5 at 60th, 120th, 160th epochs, train for 200 epochs with batchsize 128 and weight decay 5e-4, Nesterov momentum of 0.9 (I have run 2 times on my end and 0.499 is the best accuracy).
Looking forword to anyone's reply, thanks a lot again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: