Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot achieve the comparable accuracy results with the provided #69

Open
EddieEduardo opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@EddieEduardo
Copy link

Hello, thanks for code sharing.

I use Cifar100 to train and test the ShuffleNetV2, but the accuracy I got is just 0.499, all the parameter setting is consistent with the provided in READMe, which are, init lr = 0.1 divide by 5 at 60th, 120th, 160th epochs, train for 200 epochs with batchsize 128 and weight decay 5e-4, Nesterov momentum of 0.9 (I have run 2 times on my end and 0.499 is the best accuracy).

Looking forword to anyone's reply, thanks a lot again!

@EddieEduardo
Copy link
Author

Plus, my PyTorch version is 1.8.0.

@LK-WordSnake
Copy link

After repeated experiments, this code fails to achieve the described accuracy in the CIFAR100.
You can set a higher input size for training, which can achieve a higher accuracy.

@hayleeXinyi
Copy link

For densenet161, Top 1 err: tensor(0.2350) Top 5 err: tensor(0.0520)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants