You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The html-aam tests have a placeholder todo referencing the graphics-aam and svg-aam tests.
The graphics-aam tests do not make this assertion as the specification does not currently provide role mappings.
The svg-aam tests do not include an assertion on the <svg> element itself, only allowed children elements.
The wai-aria tests do not include assertions on host language implicit roles.
There are no explicit html-aria specification tests in WPT because it is focused on authors thus is ill-placed in WPT.
Proposal:
To ensure that the specifications are followed, an additional test asserting that an <svg> element has an implicit expected role of "graphics-document" in either:
The html-aam tests adjacent to the placeholder referencing the graphics-aam and svg-aam tests.
The svg-aam tests on the parent <svg> element that already exists in the test.
WPT is currently missing an assertion that a
<svg>
element has an implicit expected role of"graphics-document"
.See relevant specifications:
Currently:
<svg>
element itself, only allowed children elements.Proposal:
To ensure that the specifications are followed, an additional test asserting that an
<svg>
element has an implicit expected role of"graphics-document"
in either:<svg>
element that already exists in the test.Searched for existing tests using GitHub search, see https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aweb-platform-tests%2Fwpt%20graphics-document&type=code. Please close if I've missed coverage somewhere!
Relates somewhat to web-platform-tests/interop-accessibility#81
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: