Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Carryover evaluation: Container Queries #458

Closed
foolip opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Carryover evaluation: Container Queries #458

foolip opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
carryover-evaluation Evaluate whether to continue a focus area in the next year focus area: Container Queries

Comments

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Sep 21, 2023

Let's evaluate whether to continue the Container Queries focus area in Interop 2024.

Original proposal: #133 by @una

Tests:

We should also consider whether we should add tests for 2024.

@foolip foolip added carryover-evaluation Evaluate whether to continue a focus area in the next year focus area: Container Queries labels Sep 21, 2023
@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Sep 22, 2023

There are quite a few unlabeled tests to consider if we continue this. Some of them have been previously excluded from scope, but others are new.

If we continue this focus area, we should (later) also consider whether #433 is part of this focus area, or a new one.

@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Oct 5, 2023

For survey data and web developer demand, in preliminary results from State of HTML 2023, Container Queries (normalized to at_container) was a common response to the freeform question "Which existing HTML features or browser APIs are you unable to use because of browser differences or lack of support?"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
carryover-evaluation Evaluate whether to continue a focus area in the next year focus area: Container Queries
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants