Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification on involuntary chilling #3828

Closed
laboon opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Clarification on involuntary chilling #3828

laboon opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@laboon
Copy link
Contributor

laboon commented Sep 28, 2022

https://wiki.polkadot.network/docs/maintain-guides-how-to-chill#involuntary-chills

"Involuntary Chills
If a validator was unresponsive or found to have committed a slashable offense within two eras, the validator will be removed from the active set in a process known as involuntary chilling. When a validator has been involuntarily chilled, it is necessary for the nominators that were previously nominating that validator to re-issue the nominate call."

What does this mean "within two eras"?

And do slashable offenses mean any offense which could be slashed, or only ones which resulted in a slash? For example, if my validator is offline for an epoch, but it is the only one, it could have been slashed, but it wasn't. Is that still a "slashable event" and will that validator be involuntarily chilled? We should clarify this.

@DrW3RK DrW3RK assigned emresurmeli and unassigned emresurmeli Sep 28, 2022
@DrW3RK
Copy link
Member

DrW3RK commented Oct 3, 2022

Fixed with #3829

@DrW3RK DrW3RK closed this as completed Oct 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants