-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mention that protocol bindings can also be defined in profiles #1674
Comments
I'm ok with it. However, the main Binding Document should be used as source to look-up to find the link to the official binding definition (which can be a profile). |
I think we should mention the usage of profiles in the TD but it depends a bit on whether the spec would be published at all |
Since it is the planned that the profile for protocol binding purposes is mentioned in Architecture spec, we can close this issue here. |
from today's TD call, decided to close @benfrancis please reopen the issue when you disagree |
I like that you said "when" I disagree, not "if" :) w3c/wot-architecture#860 was closed without merging. The TD specification says:
The architecture specification says:
Neither mention that protocol bindings can also be specified in profiles. Since nothing has changed, I can't really agree that this issue has been resolved. |
From w3c/wot#1065 (comment), another way of describing this:
|
First reported in #1324:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: