Skip to content

Remove contradictory normative "must" from Section 7 preamble (first step to address transaction-amount issue in 1.3.5) #4458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

  • this is an appendix - it should not contain normative must statements
  • the must here is contradicted in the sentence immediately following, where it starts with "Where applicable"?

This is related to #4362 (comment)

* this is an appendix - it should not contain normative *must* statements
* the *must* here is contradicted in the sentence immediately following, where it starts with "Where applicable"?

This is related to #4362 (comment)
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 05165b5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/wcag2/deploys/685566afdfbd78000828da1b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4458--wcag2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke changed the title Remove contradictory normative "must" from Section 7 preamble Remove contradictory normative "must" from Section 7 preamble (first step to address transaction-amount issue in 1.3.5) Jun 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@bruce-usab bruce-usab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Briefly discussed on backlog call 6/30.

@dbjorge
Copy link
Contributor

dbjorge commented Jun 23, 2025

I'm fine with this update, personally; even if I still disagree about calling this an "appendix", I do agree that it's not the thing that should be creating a "must" requirement like this, that's the SC's job.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants