You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
New
New WG
New IG
If this is a new WG or IG charter request, link to Advance Notice, and any issue discussion:
Existing
Existing WG recharter
Existing IG recharter
If this is a charter extension or revision, any issue discussion:
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach
Groups identified in the Coordination section.
Known or potential areas of concern
None. Proposed scope and deliverables are the same. Main proposed change is the switch to perpetual CR mode. That said, note that the GPU for the Web WG is still reviewing the draft and may adjust it. Internal review in the group should conclude at the upcoming group's F2F end of October.
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? In the gpuweb/admin repository (or this strategy funnel issue)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
The group should soon request transition of the WebGPU and WGSL specifications to Candidate Recommendation.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Charter
diff from charter template
If applicable:
diff from previous charter
chair dashboard
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach
Groups identified in the Coordination section.
Known or potential areas of concern
None. Proposed scope and deliverables are the same. Main proposed change is the switch to perpetual CR mode. That said, note that the GPU for the Web WG is still reviewing the draft and may adjust it. Internal review in the group should conclude at the upcoming group's F2F end of October.
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? In the gpuweb/admin repository (or this strategy funnel issue)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
The group should soon request transition of the WebGPU and WGSL specifications to Candidate Recommendation.
Cc: @Kangz @kdashg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: