You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Therefore, authors SHOULD NOT use aria-required or aria-readonly in a columnheader that descends from a table, and user agents SHOULD NOT expose either property to assistive technologies unless the columnheader descends from a grid.
The author restrictions for these are identical, but the user agent restrictions are different. My reading of the columnheader restriction is that UAs should expose aria-required/aria-readonly in a grid, but not in a treegrid.
Was this intended?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dd8
added
the
editorial
a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo
label
Oct 4, 2024
ARIA 1.2 and the current working draft says this:
The author restrictions for these are identical, but the user agent restrictions are different. My reading of the columnheader restriction is that UAs should expose aria-required/aria-readonly in a grid, but not in a treegrid.
Was this intended?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: