Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve clarity and utility of quality reports #3040

Open
mcking65 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Improve clarity and utility of quality reports #3040

mcking65 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Any addition or improvement that doesn't fix a code bug or prose inaccuracy Example Page Related to a page containing an example implementation of a pattern Infrastructure Related to maintaining task force and repo operations, processes, systems, documentation

Comments

@mcking65
Copy link
Contributor

Per discussion of APG quality reports in the June 4, 2024 meeting,

  • Some information is not directly related to required APG coding practices.
  • It is not clear which information represents a problem and which information represents good quality.

Modify the reports to better support quality goals for APG examples:

  • Example code implements practices documented in the APG code guide.
  • Examples consistently illustrate APG practices.
  • Example documentation is complete.
@mcking65 mcking65 added enhancement Any addition or improvement that doesn't fix a code bug or prose inaccuracy Example Page Related to a page containing an example implementation of a pattern Infrastructure Related to maintaining task force and repo operations, processes, systems, documentation labels Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Any addition or improvement that doesn't fix a code bug or prose inaccuracy Example Page Related to a page containing an example implementation of a pattern Infrastructure Related to maintaining task force and repo operations, processes, systems, documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants