You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm worried the name libwhich would mislead folks into thinking this is a library-ized version of which, which is not the intended parsing of the name. Perhaps alternate names are whichlib or dlwhich?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm worried the name libwhich would mislead folks into thinking this is a library-ized version of which, which is not the intended parsing of the name.
Exactly! whichlib (:+1:) or dlwhich would be definitely less confusing.
I have no idea if this is possible, but if the binary were to be which-lib and then it could be invoked as which --lib kind of like a git extension, that would be pretty cool.
I'm worried the name
libwhich
would mislead folks into thinking this is a library-ized version ofwhich
, which is not the intended parsing of the name. Perhaps alternate names arewhichlib
ordlwhich
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: