Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About using a better model #11

Closed
wing212 opened this issue Nov 16, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

About using a better model #11

wing212 opened this issue Nov 16, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@wing212
Copy link

wing212 commented Nov 16, 2021

I would like to ask if you have used a better model for experimentation, such as deeplab V3+. Will it bring better accuracy if you use a better model?

@voldemortX
Copy link
Owner

voldemortX commented Nov 16, 2021

I would like to ask if you have used a better model for experimentation, such as deeplab V3+. Will it bring better accuracy if you use a better model?

I would say it is highly likely we can get better performance with a better model.

However, when this work finished first draft (that's like early 2020), the SSS community commonly uses DeepLabV2 (if not only DeepLabV2). I never tried other models myself (I believe in SSL, absolute performance mean little, compared to gap to Oracle or Baseline), you are encouraged to try it though, I have some better segmentation models implemented in a similar style at https://github.com/voldemortX/pytorch-auto-drive.

The same issue was raised in #1

@voldemortX
Copy link
Owner

@wing212 Closing as a duplicate of #1.

@wing212
Copy link
Author

wing212 commented Nov 17, 2021

Thank you for your reply, I will take a closer look

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants