-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Doc] Add typing hints / mypy types cleanup #3816
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your contribution on this cleanup effort! Left a few comments!
@abstractproperty | ||
@property | ||
@abstractmethod |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a note to the audience why this change makes sense
https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/abc.html#abc.abstractproperty
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <136131678+ywang96@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <136131678+ywang96@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <136131678+ywang96@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! cc @WoosukKwon @zhuohan123 about the decorator changes in interface.py
. Can one of you approve as well if you don't see anything problem with it?
latency: float = 0 | ||
ttft: float = 0 # Time to first token | ||
latency: float = 0.0 | ||
ttft: float = 0.0 # Time to first token |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so unfortunate mypy cannot handle this :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the other hand mypy hints a potential source for an actual bug - I think in this context any plausible use of that int should however also be compatible with int or float.
E.g. int(str(0))
works but int(str(0.0))
breaks.
@@ -135,7 +141,7 @@ def __init__(self, local_interval: float, labels: Dict[str, str]) -> None: | |||
self.labels = labels | |||
self.metrics = Metrics(labelnames=list(labels.keys())) | |||
|
|||
def info(self, type: str, obj: object) -> None: | |||
def info(self, type: str, obj: SupportsMetricsInfo) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
QQ: should we change the var name obj?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it would slight improve readability, but I am not sure if there is any dependency on the kwarg name. obj
is no a great variable name, I agree.
logger.error(f"Vocabulary path ({save_directory}) " | ||
"should be a directory") | ||
return | ||
raise ValueError(f"Vocabulary path ({save_directory}) " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
QQ: what's the motivation behind the functional change here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function was just copied in from some baichuan
repo. The exception is more of a this should never happen thing. save_vocabulary
is not used by vllm. I also don't want to remove the file entirely - but the return None
is not compliant to the function signature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
*file -> function
I think the reason why the function is included at all, is to keep the diff to baichuan repo low.
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <136131678+ywang96@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Roger Wang <136131678+ywang96@users.noreply.github.com>
Mostly typing only changes - should have no runtime effects. Fixed some sources of bugs.
I found a note in the Contribution guidelines
**Note:** Currently, the repository does not pass the mypy tests.
Feel free to ignore or pick the issue up if there are are to many conflicts.
FIX: no existing issue
Related: #1780
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!