refactor!: replace loupe.inspect with pretty-format

[hi-ogawa]

Description

• part of Simplify pretty-format and inspect #9582

Question

loupe is used for test.for/each title formatting. any changes there is a breaking change as it tends to effect snapshot key name. Is it a goal to port exact current loupe format to pretty-format? e.g. loupe is single quote, but pretty-format is double quote. It's rather simple to port single/double quote to pretty-format, but is it necessary to try to align?

my optinion: we can align quote, which should cover most of compatibility. but don't need to try to aim exact match regarding truncation (loupe has truncate: number) and Object.keys/getOwnPropertyNames behavior difference.

References of past loupe related issues

• fix(utils): fix objDisplay default truncate option for test.each title #4917

Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

• It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. If the feature is substantial or introduces breaking changes without a discussion, PR might be closed.
• Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
• Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.
• Please check Allow edits by maintainers to make review process faster. Note that this option is not available for repositories that are owned by Github organizations.

Tests

• Run the tests with pnpm test:ci.

Documentation

• If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs command.

Changesets

• Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.