Skip to content

apply upstream fixes #393

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

apply upstream fixes #393

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025

Conversation

Konfekt
Copy link
Contributor

@Konfekt Konfekt commented Apr 9, 2024

@chrisbra
Copy link

chrisbra commented Apr 9, 2024

you probably also want to add the colorscheme setting

@Konfekt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Konfekt commented Apr 9, 2024

Thank you!

@Konfekt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Konfekt commented Oct 4, 2024

Maybe instead a deprecation notice now that this plug-in is no longer needed for v:version > 900?

@alerque alerque merged commit 1cc6971 into vim-pandoc:master Apr 17, 2025
jez added a commit to jez/vim-pandoc-syntax that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
This was a bad merge that resulted from vim-pandoc#393 being opened before vim-pandoc#397
but landing after.

If we override the `&cpo` option and then `finish`, it will never get
set back to the saved cpo.

Instead, let's just only do the `set` if we're sure we're not going to
early exit.
jez added a commit to jez/vim-pandoc-syntax that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
This also regressed in vim-pandoc#393, but we may as well fix it here.
alerque pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2025
This was a bad merge that resulted from #393 being opened before #397
but landing after.

If we override the `&cpo` option and then `finish`, it will never get
set back to the saved cpo.

Instead, let's just only do the `set` if we're sure we're not going to
early exit.
alerque pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2025
This also regressed in #393, but we may as well fix it here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants