You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
TMOKE, The form of the dielectric tensor is[ε0 , 0 , -iε1; 0 , ε0 , 0 ; iε1 , 0 , ε0],But the reflectivity I get is the same as the dielectric tensor is [ε0 , 0 , 0; 0 , ε0 , 0 ; 0 , 0 , ε0]. Only when the dielectric tensor is [ε0 , -iε1 , 0; iε1 , ε0 , 0 ; 0 , 0 , ε0],reflectivity will change. Is S4 only able to calculate PMOKE?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry to bring this up again after 5 years, but I'm experiencing a similar issue with an anisotropic dielectric tensor. If S4 ignores the off-diagonal elements, then
[ε0 , -iε1 , 0;
iε1 , ε0 , 0 ;
0 , 0 , ε0]
shouldn't produce a different result than
[ε0 , 0 , 0;
0 , ε0 , 0 ;
0 , 0 , ε0]
yet according to OP it does. Something fishy is happening with the way the dielectric tensor is treated.
TMOKE, The form of the dielectric tensor is[ε0 , 0 , -iε1; 0 , ε0 , 0 ; iε1 , 0 , ε0],But the reflectivity I get is the same as the dielectric tensor is [ε0 , 0 , 0; 0 , ε0 , 0 ; 0 , 0 , ε0]. Only when the dielectric tensor is [ε0 , -iε1 , 0; iε1 , ε0 , 0 ; 0 , 0 , ε0],reflectivity will change. Is S4 only able to calculate PMOKE?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: