Allow a DbContext to have a derived service implementation registered #28
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @Meberem thanks for taking the time to do this! I've been very busy, so I'll try to take a look in the coming weeks, sorry about it. |
|
Hey @vany0114, do you think you'll have a chance to look at this any time soon? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
AddAppDbContextin ef core has an overload allowing a developer to specify a "Service Type" and an "Implementation Type" for a DbContext. This allows you to have a base type in a Domain project and a particular implementation in a different project. This pull request is based on the ef core code here: https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/blob/c69926a8cdd05f4427e89ac8bac734e490b3d23a/src/EFCore/Extensions/EntityFrameworkServiceCollectionExtensions.cs#L351The result is that I can now do this in my
Startup.csI don't know what you would like to do about Tests for this, as I didn't want to disrupt the existing setup.