You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I conducted a pixel expansion after segmentation on my image and noticed that there are small additional cells present in the pixel expansion generated outline that did not exist in the nuclear segmentation. After going through your notebook, I noticed that this happened in your example images as well - see screenshot attached below. I was wondering why it does this as my understanding is that the pixel expansion argument adds a pixel outline on top of the nuclear segmentation outlines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @tbudiman7, good question. It is indeed using the same seeds for the expansion. It's possible that there are very small objects which do not meet the minimum size threshold using the raw predictions, but after expansion they are over the size threshold? You could take a look at the post-processing logic and see when the expansion is applied vs when the cutoff is applied.
Hi VanValen Lab,
I conducted a pixel expansion after segmentation on my image and noticed that there are small additional cells present in the pixel expansion generated outline that did not exist in the nuclear segmentation. After going through your notebook, I noticed that this happened in your example images as well - see screenshot attached below. I was wondering why it does this as my understanding is that the pixel expansion argument adds a pixel outline on top of the nuclear segmentation outlines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: