Skip to content

Qm9mx #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Qm9mx #44

merged 13 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

FNTwin
Copy link
Collaborator

@FNTwin FNTwin commented Mar 9, 2024

Checklist:

  • Was this PR discussed in a issue? It is recommended to first discuss a new feature into a GitHub issue before opening a PR.
  • Add tests to cover the fixed bug(s) or the new introduced feature(s) (if appropriate).
  • Update the API documentation is a new function is added or an existing one is deleted.

  • Add MultixcQM9 datasets and all the isolated atom energies in a separate file.
  • Docstrings for MultixcQM9.
  • CLI dataset energy type info.

df_xyz = self._read_all_xyzs()
return [
{"energies": np.atleast_2d(en), **xyz_dict}
for xyz_dict, en in zip(df_xyz.to_dict("records"), df_energies.values.astype(np.float32))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure about the mapping here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm pretty sure the mapping logic work, I'm going to retry a reprocessing just to be sure and if everything works as expected I'm going to merge it

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prtos Mapping and collating is correct, gonna merge the PR then

@FNTwin FNTwin merged commit 0079fc5 into develop Mar 12, 2024
@FNTwin FNTwin deleted the qm9mx branch March 12, 2024 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants