Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Logical resolvers can not deal with + schemes #1968

Open
jurgenvinju opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Logical resolvers can not deal with + schemes #1968

jurgenvinju opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
bug

Comments

@jurgenvinju
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug

The current way of looking up a logical resolver for a scheme does not allow for + schemes; example if the jar+file:/// scheme was implemented with a logical resolver for the scheme jar then it would not be found because the scheme is never split on + anyway in the logicalToPhysical algorithm.
@jurgenvinju
Copy link
Member Author

That's why #1962 will not support mvn+sources:/// and mvn+javadoc:///; could be added easily to the resolver but the infrastructure in URIResolverRegistry does not allow for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jurgenvinju