Skip to content

Conversation

@dsowinski2
Copy link
Member

  1. Do we want to check if for selected model tool calling is available and display such information for user?

@dsowinski2 dsowinski2 self-assigned this Nov 18, 2025
@dsowinski2 dsowinski2 force-pushed the feat/ent-167-create-a-tool-calling-version-of-ocr-to-order-agent branch from 6b8753a to fd8a70c Compare November 21, 2025 14:11
@dsowinski2 dsowinski2 changed the base branch from main to feat/add-tool-calling-agent-package November 21, 2025 14:12
@dsowinski2 dsowinski2 force-pushed the feat/add-tool-calling-agent-package branch 3 times, most recently from b20023a to f0c2f7a Compare November 24, 2025 14:27
@dsowinski2 dsowinski2 force-pushed the feat/ent-167-create-a-tool-calling-version-of-ocr-to-order-agent branch from fd8a70c to 174ba2d Compare November 24, 2025 14:36
Base automatically changed from feat/add-tool-calling-agent-package to main December 8, 2025 13:45
@rafalcymerys rafalcymerys force-pushed the feat/ent-167-create-a-tool-calling-version-of-ocr-to-order-agent branch from 174ba2d to 8c00889 Compare December 8, 2025 13:52
@rafalcymerys
Copy link
Member

@dsowinski2 is we're moving all these files from e..g enthusiast_agent_ocr_to_order -> re_act/enthusiast_agent_ocr_to_order, shouldn't we at least provide a fallback for the old import? Otherwise upgrading this package breaks user's config.

@rafalcymerys rafalcymerys marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 15:01
@rafalcymerys rafalcymerys merged commit 5498e8f into main Dec 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@rafalcymerys rafalcymerys deleted the feat/ent-167-create-a-tool-calling-version-of-ocr-to-order-agent branch December 8, 2025 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants