Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support ECMA-402 datetime range formatting #2998

Open
hsivonen opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Support ECMA-402 datetime range formatting #2998

hsivonen opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
blocked A dependency must be resolved before this is actionable C-datetime Component: datetime, calendars, time zones S-large Size: A few weeks (larger feature, major refactoring) U-ecma402 User: ECMA-402 compatibility
Milestone
Backlog ⟨P4⟩

Comments

@hsivonen
Copy link
Member

It appears that formatting datetime ranges is currently missing from the ICU4X's coverage of the ECMA-402 feature set. For full ECMA-402 coverage, we should add support.
@hsivonen hsivonen added the C-datetime Component: datetime, calendars, time zones label Jan 18, 2023
@sffc sffc added the U-ecma402 User: ECMA-402 compatibility label Jan 18, 2023
@sffc
Copy link
Member

sffc commented Jan 19, 2023

We should finish regular datetime formatting before we implement datetime range formatting.

@sffc sffc added the blocked A dependency must be resolved before this is actionable label Jan 19, 2023
@sffc sffc added this to the Backlog ⟨P4⟩ milestone Jan 19, 2023
@sffc sffc added the S-large Size: A few weeks (larger feature, major refactoring) label Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
blocked A dependency must be resolved before this is actionable C-datetime Component: datetime, calendars, time zones S-large Size: A few weeks (larger feature, major refactoring) U-ecma402 User: ECMA-402 compatibility
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog ⟨P4⟩
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hsivonen @sffc