-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'wandb_logger' referenced before assignment #2562
Comments
👋 Hello @wq9, thank you for your interest in 🚀 YOLOv5! Please visit our ⭐️ Tutorials to get started, where you can find quickstart guides for simple tasks like Custom Data Training all the way to advanced concepts like Hyperparameter Evolution. If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please provide screenshots and minimum viable code to reproduce your issue, otherwise we can not help you. If this is a custom training ❓ Question, please provide as much information as possible, including dataset images, training logs, screenshots, and a public link to online W&B logging if available. For business inquiries or professional support requests please visit https://www.ultralytics.com or email Glenn Jocher at glenn.jocher@ultralytics.com. RequirementsPython 3.8 or later with all requirements.txt dependencies installed, including $ pip install -r requirements.txt EnvironmentsYOLOv5 may be run in any of the following up-to-date verified environments (with all dependencies including CUDA/CUDNN, Python and PyTorch preinstalled):
StatusIf this badge is green, all YOLOv5 GitHub Actions Continuous Integration (CI) tests are currently passing. CI tests verify correct operation of YOLOv5 training (train.py), testing (test.py), inference (detect.py) and export (export.py) on MacOS, Windows, and Ubuntu every 24 hours and on every commit. |
@wq9 thank you for the bug report! @AyushExel do you think there's a quick fix for this (i.e. next few hours)? If not we should probably revert #2125 until we have a chance to debug further. |
@glenn-jocher Yes I'm looking into this now. Any idea what's the difference in execution in multi-GPU case? |
@glenn-jocher Okay I think I found the solution. Testing it in a bit. I'll let you know |
@AyushExel I'm not sure what it could be. Multi-GPU is always tricky. Rank 0 and -1 processes are intended for the main process/GPU, while all other parts of the code will run on all processes. Do you have access to a Multi-GPU instance to test on? |
@glenn-jocher Yes, I'm testing on multi-GPUS. I usually work on single GPU so this test didn't cross my mind. In the previous integration, wandb logging worked only with the single GPU case right? Juding by the previous integration, here:
|
@AyushExel oh, no, master before PR performed W&B logging with Multi-GPU well, i.e.: See Multi-GPU Tutorial for DP and DDP commands (we need to test both). DDP is strongly preferred though due to it's better performance. |
@glenn-jocher thanks for the info. I'm working on a fix. |
@glenn-jocher Okay this is fixed. I'm testing in a different environment without wandb installed. Expect a PR in a few minutes |
@glenn-jocher I've tested on my end and the fix seems to work in all cases. CI tests are running on the PR now. Hopefully, I haven't introduced any CI typos. |
🐛 Bug
Multi-GPU Training does not work with latest commit (e8fc97a Improved W&B integration)
To Reproduce (REQUIRED)
Output:
Expected behavior
Normal Multi-GPU Training
Environment
N/A
Additional context
wandb_logger
is not defined for child processes, so child processes terminates prematurely (e8fc97a#diff-ed183d67207df065a11e1289f19d34cc2abbc5448dea952683cfe9728c342b95R76)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: