Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare v1.9.0 #605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2018
Merged

Prepare v1.9.0 #605

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2018

Conversation

akshayjshah
Copy link
Contributor

Includes some perf optimization when using zap.Reflect and some exposed API for user-supplied log sinks.

@akshayjshah akshayjshah requested review from abhinav and prashantv June 28, 2018 21:14
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #605 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #605   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.23%   97.23%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        2063     2063           
=======================================
  Hits         2006     2006           
  Misses         49       49           
  Partials        8        8

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7e7e266...032a073. Read the comment docs.

@prashantv
Copy link
Collaborator

Left some minor comments related to the new API (https://godoc.org/go.uber.org/zap#RegisterSink).

If we're fine with that API, then this lgtm.

@akshayjshah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Believe I've addressed feedback re: user-defined log sinks.

@akshayjshah akshayjshah merged commit cefb180 into master Jul 19, 2018
@abhinav abhinav deleted the ajs/release branch September 2, 2020 16:54
cgxxv pushed a commit to cgxxv/zap that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants