-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Android] Viewport Size protection makes site loading very little long #65
Comments
could you try this version?
if it is a problem with the feature, I will try to fix it. if you can, try that version first, in case it doesn't solve it, let's better understand where the problem might be. |
Yes, my version is the/ your latest. |
OK, so some more information is needed, both about the device and the sites where you detect the anomaly. |
Google Pixel 7 Randomly visiting pages on the wwww: www.brewcompany.de (took very long to load) All of them took some time to load, but I wasn't able to fully reproduce my issues. And it seems like pages with a lot of content/ images are much more often affected than text-only pages. |
Almost instant loading here with last test version. |
Is the same thing that I also detect. @HarriBuh confirm that you have tried https://github.com/uazo/bromite-buildtools/releases/tag/TESTONLY ? |
@uazo I can confirm that the issues I had are gone since using your TESTONLY version. You fixed it 🔨👍 |
perfect! |
I had an issue while loading a image-heavy page once or twice. The page would not load the correct order of the images and text boxes (sorry for my bad vocabulary, but I'm no IT guy), much like it would do when blocking Javascript completely. Several manual reloading triggers solved it. |
Since the introduction of the Viewport Size protection almost every page one the www (almost = not sure whether it is always the case or not) takes a minute to fully load.
When I turn the option off, everything is fast and well again.
Is this the sacrifice for improved security or just a flaw of the feature that will probably get fixed anytime soon?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: