fix(website): press the Report an Issue button makes error if eslintrc does not include rules

[developer-bandi]

PR Checklist

• Addresses an existing open issue: fixes Bug(website): clicking playground's "Report as Issue" throws exception when "rules" is omitted from eslintrc #10365
• That issue was marked as accepting prs
• Steps in Contributing were taken

Overview

Fixed an error that occurred when pressing the Report an Issue button when eslintrc does not include rules.

[typescript-eslint]

Thanks for the PR, @developer-bandi!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

---

🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	9634b83
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6745049ffb40bd0008cbb885
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-10367--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 99 (no change from production) Accessibility: 100 (no change from production) Best Practices: 92 (no change from production) SEO: 98 (no change from production) PWA: 80 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 9634b83. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 32 targets

• nx test parser --coverage=false
• nx test visitor-keys --coverage=false
• nx test rule-tester --coverage=false
• nx test utils --coverage=false
• nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false
• nx test visitor-keys
• nx run types:build
• nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false
• nx test typescript-eslint --coverage=false
• nx test type-utils --coverage=false
• nx test scope-manager --coverage=false
• nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --exclude website-eslint
• nx test utils
• nx test type-utils
• nx test typescript-eslint
• nx test scope-manager
• nx run-many --target=clean
• nx test typescript-estree
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types --coverage=false
• nx test rule-tester
• nx run-many --target=lint --exclude eslint-plugin
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types
• nx run-many --target=build --parallel --exclude=website --exclude=website-eslint
• nx test parser
• nx test eslint-plugin
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal
• nx test ast-spec --coverage=false
• nx test ast-spec
• nx run-many --target=typecheck
• nx run integration-tests:test
• nx generate-configs

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

[kirkwaiblinger]

Nice, thanks! 🙂

[kirkwaiblinger]

Oh, I guess you'll have to address the lint error that complains about this not being possibly-nullish

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.75%. Comparing base (f74a8fa) to head (9634b83).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #10367   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.75%   86.75%           
=======================================
  Files         443      443           
  Lines       15289    15289           
  Branches     4446     4446           
=======================================
  Hits        13264    13264           
  Misses       1672     1672           
  Partials      353      353           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittest	86.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[developer-bandi]

After looking at the lint error that occurred, I thought it would be better to set the default value of rules to an empty object when parsing eslintrc, so I modified it like this.

[kirkwaiblinger]

Thanks!