Fix using mbuf after returning it to mbuf free list for redis mset.

[huachaohuang]

No description provided.

[andyqzb]

I merge the bugfix in #486 , but using mbuf_length on a mbuf is not a good way after putting the mbuf to the free list. So can you create a new pr based on the master, I want to merge your code.

[andyqzb]

What is the intention of this line?

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[TysonAndre]

I merge the bugfix in 486 , but using mbuf_length on a mbuf is not a good way after putting the mbuf to the free list. So can you create a new pr based on the master, I want to merge your code.

My understanding of this: twemproxy is single threaded so it doesn't cause issues in practice, but would agree in principle (e.g. if mbuf_free were to be replaced with an actuall free call as a debug compile option to debug memory leaks or use-after free)