Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we use the bi class or not? (for icon font) #1878

Closed
fulldecent opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1879
Closed

Do we use the bi class or not? (for icon font) #1878

fulldecent opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1879
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@fulldecent
Copy link

fulldecent commented Nov 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Documentation is conflicting and says both:

Screenshot 2023-11-22 at 01 21 02

Screenshot 2023-11-22 at 01 21 17

I prefer no bi because bi causes other problems, as discussed and fixed in PR #1845
@fulldecent fulldecent added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 22, 2023
@fulldecent fulldecent mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2023
Closed
@fulldecent fulldecent changed the title Do we use the bi class or not? Do we use the bi class or not? (for icon font) Nov 22, 2023
@XhmikosR XhmikosR added docs Improvements or additions to documentation and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 22, 2023
@XhmikosR XhmikosR mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

docs: fix missing bi class from font examples twbs/icons
2 participants
@XhmikosR @fulldecent