Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CVE-2023-5678 (Medium) detected in OpenSSLOpenSSL_1_1_1g #630

Open
mend-bolt-for-github bot opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

CVE-2023-5678 (Medium) detected in OpenSSLOpenSSL_1_1_1g #630

mend-bolt-for-github bot opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Mend: dependency security vulnerability Security vulnerability detected by WhiteSource

Comments

@mend-bolt-for-github
Copy link

mend-bolt-for-github bot commented Feb 29, 2024

CVE-2023-5678 - Medium Severity Vulnerability

Vulnerable Library - OpenSSLOpenSSL_1_1_1g

TLS/SSL and crypto library

Library home page: https://github.com/OpenSSL/OpenSSL.git

Found in HEAD commit: 00fdb00d5bdbaea4fec4642989374d82cbdb1a3c

Found in base branch: master

Vulnerable Source Files (6)

/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_check.c
/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c
/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_key.c
/deps/openssl/openssl/include/openssl/dherr.h
/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_check.c
/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c

Vulnerability Details

Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking
excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to
generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications
that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.
Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from
an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),
DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore
vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.

Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large
P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q.

An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and
supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be
vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.

DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of
other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other
functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this
are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the
"-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Publish Date: 2023-11-06

URL: CVE-2023-5678

CVSS 3 Score Details (5.3)

Base Score Metrics:

  • Exploitability Metrics:
    • Attack Vector: Network
    • Attack Complexity: Low
    • Privileges Required: None
    • User Interaction: None
    • Scope: Unchanged
  • Impact Metrics:
    • Confidentiality Impact: None
    • Integrity Impact: None
    • Availability Impact: Low

For more information on CVSS3 Scores, click here.

Suggested Fix

Type: Upgrade version

Origin: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678

Release Date: 2023-11-06

Fix Resolution: OpenSSL_1_1_1x,openssl-3.0.13,openssl-3.1.5


Step up your Open Source Security Game with Mend here

@mend-bolt-for-github mend-bolt-for-github bot added the Mend: dependency security vulnerability Security vulnerability detected by WhiteSource label Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Mend: dependency security vulnerability Security vulnerability detected by WhiteSource
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants