-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Respect pre-commit hooks #48
Comments
we're at the mercy of upstream for this: libgit2/libgit2#4620 and i would rather not hand-roll an implementation of hooks without upstream support |
Hi! Thanks for the great project, git-absorb is really a fantastic help! Are there simpler alternatives? |
honestly, i do not know of any workarounds. |
All right, thanks for the reply :-) |
Best wishes for the new year! |
sorry, but like i said before, i'm not interested in hand-rolling an implementation of hooks, period. there has to be upstream support for running them the right way. |
That's fine by me. The workaround I was thinking about is the following:
Which to me solves the problem in a satisfying way, as opposed to the previous one. Thank you again for your work. |
Hi! 👋
First of all, thanks for the great project.
I am finding that, when running the command, it does not follow any hooks I have defined for the project (especially important with
pre-commit
hooks). Is there a way of forcing it with the current code by changing any configuration?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: