Replies: 1 comment
-
I don't know if I should support this kind of syntax. While it may increase the plugin's adoption, it feels like a step back. I'll keep this issue open for now for any future objections. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
TL;DR - support the following syntax:
Currently, many libraries don't come with an SQL template tag out of the box (such as pg, sequelize, etc), and some devs may prefer using normal strings with parameterized variables ($1, $2, ...) with an array of values.
We should probably support that kind of syntax as well.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions