Skip to content

Conversation

@GhouI
Copy link

@GhouI GhouI commented Nov 9, 2025

Changed grammar wording to be more professional.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Refined README wording, grammar, and punctuation for clarity and consistency.
    • Standardized capitalization (e.g., acronyms) and URL/formatting conventions in support, licensing, and acknowledgments.
    • Reworked maintainer notes and usage guidance for clearer presentation; minor formatting fixes in examples and code snippets.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@GhouI has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c41013 and a665cca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (5 hunks)

Walkthrough

README.md received editorial and formatting refinements: wording tweaks, capitalization and punctuation fixes (e.g., "PDF"), URL and license text adjustments, and a renamed "Maintainer notes" section. No code, API, or behavioral changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
README.md
Editorial pass: wording and phrasing tweaks, capitalization standardization (e.g., PDF), punctuation and line-break adjustments, URL formatting cleanup, reworded maintainer notes, and minor formatting in code snippets and acknowledgments. No functional or API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single-file, editorial-only changes
  • No logic or interface modifications
  • Review focus: wording and formatting consistency

Poem

🐰 I hopped through the readme, nibbled a phrase,
Tuned caps and commas in delicate ways.
No functions disturbed, just sentences bright—
A polished small page, soft moonlit and light. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: grammar and wording fixes in README/docs' directly and accurately summarizes the main change: editorial improvements to documentation for better grammar and professional wording.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 9, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)

17-21: Consider removing the intensifier "quite" for more direct communication.

Line 21 contains "I also respond quite quickly on Discord," which could be strengthened by removing the qualifier "quite." Professional documentation typically benefits from more direct language such as "I respond quickly" or "I'm responsive on Discord for project questions."


24-24: Wrap bare URL in markdown syntax to resolve linting warnings.

The URL on line 24 is flagged by markdownlint (MD034) for being bare. Wrap it in angle brackets or markdown link syntax to align with markdown best practices:

-You can use our wiki to get started: https://tryagi.github.io/LangChain/
+You can use our wiki to get started: <https://tryagi.github.io/LangChain/>

Alternatively, convert to a markdown link if more concise wording is preferred.


100-102: Wrap bare URLs in Support section to resolve markdown linting warnings.

Lines 100–102 contain bare URLs flagged by markdownlint (MD034). For consistency and to align with markdown best practices, wrap them in angle brackets:

-Priority place for bugs: https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/issues
-Priority place for ideas and general questions: https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/discussions
-Discord: https://discord.gg/Ca2xhfBf3v
+Priority place for bugs: <https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/issues>
+Priority place for ideas and general questions: <https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/discussions>
+Discord: <https://discord.gg/Ca2xhfBf3v>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9bf06a9 and d7f7b05.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~21-~21: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘quite’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...re any money received. - I also respond quite quickly on Discord for any questions related to...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~119-~119: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...is supported by CodeRabbit through the [Open Source Support Program](https://github.com/mar...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

24-24: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


100-100: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


101-101: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


102-102: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)

11-15: Editorial improvements strengthen project positioning.

The rewording in the introduction and SemanticKernel comparison section conveys a more professional tone while maintaining clarity about the project's design philosophy and openness to third-party libraries.


39-39: Code example comment clarifies intent.

The comment rewording improves readability and maintains consistency with professional documentation standards.


85-87: Code formatting aligns with C# style conventions.

The spacing around operators in the code example improves consistency with standard C# formatting guidelines.


105-109: Legal section rewording improves clarity and professionalism.

The refined language in the licensing and attribution statements is more formal and precise, enhancing the professionalism of the legal disclaimers without changing substantive licensing information.


119-119: Program name matches official branding; static analysis flag is likely a false positive.

While static analysis suggests hyphenating "Open Source Support Program," this appears to be the official program name from CodeRabbit. Preserve the current phrasing to maintain consistency with official branding and documentation.

@GhouI GhouI force-pushed the fix/docs-grammar-readme branch from d7f7b05 to 9c41013 Compare November 9, 2025 14:11
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

21-21: Consider removing the weak intensifier "quite".

The phrase "I also respond quite quickly" uses an over-used intensifier. For a more professional tone consistent with the PR objectives, consider: "I also respond quickly on Discord for any questions related to the project."

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7f7b05 and 9c41013.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~21-~21: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘quite’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...re any money received. - I also respond quite quickly on Discord for any questions related to...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~119-~119: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...is supported by CodeRabbit through the [Open Source Support Program](https://github.com/mar...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

24-24: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


100-100: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


101-101: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


102-102: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test / Build, test and publish
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)

11-15: Editorial improvements enhance clarity.

The wording refinements—changing "good" to "useful" and adding "several" before "limitations"—make the messaging more precise and professional without altering substance.


17-21: Section name improves professionalism.

Renaming from "I want to note" to "Maintainer notes" is more formal and descriptive. The bullet structure is clear and well-organized.


39-39: PDF capitalization is correct.

The update to capitalize "PDF" as an acronym is appropriate.


85-86: Minor formatting improvement.

The spacing adjustment in the console output string enhances consistency and readability of the example code.


105-109: Legal section wording is clear and concise.

The refinements to the legal information section maintain accuracy while improving clarity and professionalism. The licensing statement is now more direct.

GhouI and others added 2 commits November 9, 2025 14:15
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
"Open Source Support Program" should be
hyphenated when used as a compound adjective"  as mentioned from coderabbit

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@GhouI
Copy link
Author

GhouI commented Nov 9, 2025

@HavenDV Everything is good for a merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants