-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
docs: grammar and wording fixes in README/docs #591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@GhouI has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughREADME.md received editorial and formatting refinements: wording tweaks, capitalization and punctuation fixes (e.g., "PDF"), URL and license text adjustments, and a renamed "Maintainer notes" section. No code, API, or behavioral changes were made. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)
17-21: Consider removing the intensifier "quite" for more direct communication.Line 21 contains "I also respond quite quickly on Discord," which could be strengthened by removing the qualifier "quite." Professional documentation typically benefits from more direct language such as "I respond quickly" or "I'm responsive on Discord for project questions."
24-24: Wrap bare URL in markdown syntax to resolve linting warnings.The URL on line 24 is flagged by markdownlint (MD034) for being bare. Wrap it in angle brackets or markdown link syntax to align with markdown best practices:
-You can use our wiki to get started: https://tryagi.github.io/LangChain/ +You can use our wiki to get started: <https://tryagi.github.io/LangChain/>Alternatively, convert to a markdown link if more concise wording is preferred.
100-102: Wrap bare URLs in Support section to resolve markdown linting warnings.Lines 100–102 contain bare URLs flagged by markdownlint (MD034). For consistency and to align with markdown best practices, wrap them in angle brackets:
-Priority place for bugs: https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/issues -Priority place for ideas and general questions: https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/discussions -Discord: https://discord.gg/Ca2xhfBf3v +Priority place for bugs: <https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/issues> +Priority place for ideas and general questions: <https://github.com/tryAGI/LangChain/discussions> +Discord: <https://discord.gg/Ca2xhfBf3v>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~21-~21: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘quite’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...re any money received. - I also respond quite quickly on Discord for any questions related to...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
[uncategorized] ~119-~119: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...is supported by CodeRabbit through the [Open Source Support Program](https://github.com/mar...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
24-24: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
100-100: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
101-101: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
102-102: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)
11-15: Editorial improvements strengthen project positioning.The rewording in the introduction and SemanticKernel comparison section conveys a more professional tone while maintaining clarity about the project's design philosophy and openness to third-party libraries.
39-39: Code example comment clarifies intent.The comment rewording improves readability and maintains consistency with professional documentation standards.
85-87: Code formatting aligns with C# style conventions.The spacing around operators in the code example improves consistency with standard C# formatting guidelines.
105-109: Legal section rewording improves clarity and professionalism.The refined language in the licensing and attribution statements is more formal and precise, enhancing the professionalism of the legal disclaimers without changing substantive licensing information.
119-119: Program name matches official branding; static analysis flag is likely a false positive.While static analysis suggests hyphenating "Open Source Support Program," this appears to be the official program name from CodeRabbit. Preserve the current phrasing to maintain consistency with official branding and documentation.
d7f7b05 to
9c41013
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
21-21: Consider removing the weak intensifier "quite".The phrase "I also respond quite quickly" uses an over-used intensifier. For a more professional tone consistent with the PR objectives, consider: "I also respond quickly on Discord for any questions related to the project."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~21-~21: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘quite’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...re any money received. - I also respond quite quickly on Discord for any questions related to...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
[uncategorized] ~119-~119: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...is supported by CodeRabbit through the [Open Source Support Program](https://github.com/mar...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
24-24: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
100-100: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
101-101: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
102-102: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Test / Build, test and publish
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)
11-15: Editorial improvements enhance clarity.The wording refinements—changing "good" to "useful" and adding "several" before "limitations"—make the messaging more precise and professional without altering substance.
17-21: Section name improves professionalism.Renaming from "I want to note" to "Maintainer notes" is more formal and descriptive. The bullet structure is clear and well-organized.
39-39: PDF capitalization is correct.The update to capitalize "PDF" as an acronym is appropriate.
85-86: Minor formatting improvement.The spacing adjustment in the console output string enhances consistency and readability of the example code.
105-109: Legal section wording is clear and concise.The refinements to the legal information section maintain accuracy while improving clarity and professionalism. The licensing statement is now more direct.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
"Open Source Support Program" should be hyphenated when used as a compound adjective" as mentioned from coderabbit Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@HavenDV Everything is good for a merge. |
Changed grammar wording to be more professional.
Summary by CodeRabbit