-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PhysIO user and developer meeting at ISMRM #186
Comments
@mrikasper this sounds like a great idea. Unfortunately I won't be at ISMRM this year. But I will be in Glasgow for OHBM if anyone wants to meet up. |
Hello, Same for me, I will probably be attending OHBM, but not ISMRM. Best, |
I am planning to be at ISMRM (my first ISMRM and first in-person conference since covid!) and would like to meet. We haven't been using PhysIO recently, but are still collecting physio during our DMCC fMRI sessions and I hope to analyze it properly at some point. |
Dear all, Thank you so much for your feedback, that's great! I would suggest 3 things:
All the best, and looking forward to meeting you soon, |
Hi all! I'm everything but an expert, but if you want I can chip in in the external contributors attribution with the little experience I got in past years (in/around other dev teams). See you in the upcoming month(s) in the UK! |
Dear PhysIO users/developers/friends @DanielHoffmannAyala @benoitberanger @jsheunis @nbuergi @alexsayal @nbeliy @smoia @jaetzel, I realize the virtual part of OHBM has already started and soon some of you will meet in person at OHBM. I will be on parental leave for a few weeks starting tomorrow. It was great to see some of you at ISMRM and exchange ideas and experiences, and I realize this is best done in person. So I asked Johanna Bayer @likeajumprope - whom you might know from the @brainhackorg or @ohbm Hackathon - whether she could meet with you during the conference to continue the conversation. Johanna and I worked on a project in Zurich together previously, and she might come to Toronto for a few months to work on open science software development with me, so I thought that would be a great way to introduce her to the PhysIO community. Maybe she can reach out to you to find time for a coffee and chat about missing features/use cases/communication around PhysIO, and brainstorm about properly attributing external contributions. I recently had a first go at a "Ten Simple Rules for PhysIO-logical Noise Correction in fMRI" talk, and this could develop into a tutorial/white paper with all of the external contributors as co-authors. Just a thought to inspire discussion. All the best, |
Hi all! |
I'm in 👍 😁 |
That sounds great, @smoia! A pity I cannot be there. Cheers, |
It will have online interaction, but to be fair I think you'll have other things on your mind that week 😅 |
Hi all! I can't guarantee 100% that the emergent session I'll propose and will constitute the meeting will be picked up, but I'll try as hard as I can to make it happen! |
Hi all, our emergent session has been confirmed for Tuesday evening at 17.45 in the Open Science room (in the gala room, SEC Armadillo). I'd be happy to see you there, and if you have suggestion on topics to cover - or you want to help with the hosting, please let me know! |
Dear PhysIO users and developers,
I will be attending the ISMRM conference in London this year (not OHBM though). If you are also coming and would like to meet in person to discuss the direction of PhysIO and your use cases for future development, this would be a great opportunity.
I have tagged our external contributors here: @DanielHoffmannAyala @benoitberanger @jsheunis @nbuergi @alexsayal @nbeliy, but of course anyone interested in PhysIO would be very welcome to attend.
Please let me know if this is of interest (either here or via e-mail, see README), and I can organize a little get-together.
All the best,
Lars
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: