You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the terminology matcher is quite complex and very inefficient, particularly if you have a large terminology DB. There is only so much this can be optimised in sql.
Using an indexer such as Elasticsearch which has built in support for more complex matching, and is faster for this type of query should hopefully fix this issue.
In future we may want to look at direct client to Elasticsearch querying or adding the ability to query terminology matches from other sources, but for now it would be good to get this into Elasticsearch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the terminology matcher is quite complex and very inefficient, particularly if you have a large terminology DB. There is only so much this can be optimised in sql.
Using an indexer such as Elasticsearch which has built in support for more complex matching, and is faster for this type of query should hopefully fix this issue.
In future we may want to look at direct client to Elasticsearch querying or adding the ability to query terminology matches from other sources, but for now it would be good to get this into Elasticsearch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: