Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capability for versions in projects #337

Closed
transl8bzimport opened this issue Mar 23, 2006 · 5 comments
Closed

Capability for versions in projects #337

transl8bzimport opened this issue Mar 23, 2006 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@transl8bzimport
Copy link

Version: 0.6.3

Originally posted by Oscar Manuel Gómez Senovilla:

This is a RFE. I think that products (projects) should have a way to create
versions inside themselves, before passing to the language. So, I think instead
of the current structure po/$project/$language, it should be something like
po/$project/$version/$language.

There are strong reasons for this. Take that, for instance, you have to choose
among one of the existing in
ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/POT/2.0.1/, and it’s no
good to create different projects and not to take profit of previous work.

A related issue (not sure if it’s for another bug, or not a bug at all) is to
import a translation of a previous version of the same language.

@sumpfralle
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
my proposal is similar to the one of the original poster:
I would like to have another project hierarchie – but this should not be closely
tight to different versions of the same program.

Maybe something like: Group → Project → Language

Some people would use this to group different versions of the same program.
Other people would group projects that belong together (in my case: many plugins
with independent language files).

Maybe there could be a solution for both of these groups?

regards,
lars

@sumpfralle
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
please ignore my previous comment – I didn’t understand the directory structure
in the right way.

Lars

@unho unho changed the title Capabilitly for versions in projects Capability for versions in projects Jul 4, 2015
@phlax phlax added this to the Feature specs milestone Feb 26, 2016
@pascalrobert
Copy link

As asked in the Gitter group, I'm adding my comment:

One of our teams is using Git-flow, so they have translations in multiple branches (mostly two branches). Currently, we have one project per branch in Pootle, which is not optimal since our translators need to check both projects. Any suggestions on how we can have one project in Pootle with .po/.pot files coming from multiple branches? Something similar to posummit (http://pology.nedohodnik.net/doc/user/en_US/ch-summit.html) would be great.

@phlax
Copy link
Member

phlax commented Jul 27, 2016

hi @pascalrobert looks like a good feature. We are currently beta-testing pootle_fs which brings back vcs functionality. I will take a better look at your suggestion as we continue to work on it.

@comradekingu
Copy link
Collaborator

It is now possible to upload an old branch onto a new one, instead of adding complexity, the proposed solution is #6854

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants
@phlax @pascalrobert @sumpfralle @transl8bzimport @comradekingu and others