Timgad lsm v1 test #384
Closed
Timgad lsm v1 test #384
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zuern
reviewed
Jan 24, 2017
| help | ||
| This selects TIMGAD, which applies restrictions on module auto-loading | ||
| feature. Further information can be found in | ||
| Documentation/security/timgad.txt. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing the further documentation. Also, Linus doesn't accept PRs on Github.
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2017
…e enabled In order to prevent accessing the hpd registers outside of the display power wells, we should refrain from writing to the registers before the display interrupts are enabled. [ 4.740136] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:795 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740155] Unclaimed read from register 0x1e1110 [ 4.740168] Modules linked in: i915(+) intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers [ 4.740190] CPU: 1 PID: 221 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.10.0-rc6+ torvalds#384 [ 4.740203] Hardware name: / , BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0027.2015.0507.1758 05/07/2015 [ 4.740220] Call Trace: [ 4.740236] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6f [ 4.740251] __warn+0xc1/0xe0 [ 4.740265] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 [ 4.740281] ? insert_work+0x77/0xc0 [ 4.740355] ? fwtable_write32+0x90/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740431] __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740507] fwtable_read32+0xd8/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740575] i915_hpd_irq_setup+0xa5/0x100 [i915] [ 4.740649] intel_hpd_init+0x68/0x80 [i915] [ 4.740716] i915_driver_load+0xe19/0x1380 [i915] [ 4.740784] i915_pci_probe+0x32/0x90 [i915] [ 4.740799] pci_device_probe+0x8b/0xf0 [ 4.740815] driver_probe_device+0x2b6/0x450 [ 4.740828] __driver_attach+0xda/0xe0 [ 4.740841] ? driver_probe_device+0x450/0x450 [ 4.740853] bus_for_each_dev+0x5b/0x90 [ 4.740865] driver_attach+0x19/0x20 [ 4.740878] bus_add_driver+0x166/0x260 [ 4.740892] driver_register+0x5b/0xd0 [ 4.740906] ? 0xffffffffa0166000 [ 4.740920] __pci_register_driver+0x47/0x50 [ 4.740985] i915_init+0x5c/0x5e [i915] [ 4.740999] do_one_initcall+0x3e/0x160 [ 4.741015] ? __vunmap+0x7c/0xc0 [ 4.741029] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xcf/0x120 [ 4.741045] do_init_module+0x55/0x1c4 [ 4.741060] load_module+0x1f3f/0x25b0 [ 4.741073] ? __symbol_put+0x40/0x40 [ 4.741086] ? kernel_read_file+0x100/0x190 [ 4.741100] SYSC_finit_module+0xbc/0xf0 [ 4.741112] SyS_finit_module+0x9/0x10 [ 4.741125] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x17/0x98 [ 4.741135] RIP: 0033:0x7f8559a140f9 [ 4.741145] RSP: 002b:00007fff7509a3e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 4.741161] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f855aba02d1 RCX: 00007f8559a140f9 [ 4.741172] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055b6db0914f0 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 4.741183] RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000e [ 4.741193] R10: 0000000000000011 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b6db0854d0 [ 4.741204] R13: 000055b6db091150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055b6db035924 Fixes: 19625e8 ("drm/i915: Enable polling when we don't have hpd") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
matt-auld
pushed a commit
to matt-auld/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2017
…e enabled In order to prevent accessing the hpd registers outside of the display power wells, we should refrain from writing to the registers before the display interrupts are enabled. [ 4.740136] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:795 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740155] Unclaimed read from register 0x1e1110 [ 4.740168] Modules linked in: i915(+) intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers [ 4.740190] CPU: 1 PID: 221 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.10.0-rc6+ torvalds#384 [ 4.740203] Hardware name: / , BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0027.2015.0507.1758 05/07/2015 [ 4.740220] Call Trace: [ 4.740236] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6f [ 4.740251] __warn+0xc1/0xe0 [ 4.740265] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 [ 4.740281] ? insert_work+0x77/0xc0 [ 4.740355] ? fwtable_write32+0x90/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740431] __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740507] fwtable_read32+0xd8/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740575] i915_hpd_irq_setup+0xa5/0x100 [i915] [ 4.740649] intel_hpd_init+0x68/0x80 [i915] [ 4.740716] i915_driver_load+0xe19/0x1380 [i915] [ 4.740784] i915_pci_probe+0x32/0x90 [i915] [ 4.740799] pci_device_probe+0x8b/0xf0 [ 4.740815] driver_probe_device+0x2b6/0x450 [ 4.740828] __driver_attach+0xda/0xe0 [ 4.740841] ? driver_probe_device+0x450/0x450 [ 4.740853] bus_for_each_dev+0x5b/0x90 [ 4.740865] driver_attach+0x19/0x20 [ 4.740878] bus_add_driver+0x166/0x260 [ 4.740892] driver_register+0x5b/0xd0 [ 4.740906] ? 0xffffffffa0166000 [ 4.740920] __pci_register_driver+0x47/0x50 [ 4.740985] i915_init+0x5c/0x5e [i915] [ 4.740999] do_one_initcall+0x3e/0x160 [ 4.741015] ? __vunmap+0x7c/0xc0 [ 4.741029] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xcf/0x120 [ 4.741045] do_init_module+0x55/0x1c4 [ 4.741060] load_module+0x1f3f/0x25b0 [ 4.741073] ? __symbol_put+0x40/0x40 [ 4.741086] ? kernel_read_file+0x100/0x190 [ 4.741100] SYSC_finit_module+0xbc/0xf0 [ 4.741112] SyS_finit_module+0x9/0x10 [ 4.741125] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x17/0x98 [ 4.741135] RIP: 0033:0x7f8559a140f9 [ 4.741145] RSP: 002b:00007fff7509a3e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 4.741161] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f855aba02d1 RCX: 00007f8559a140f9 [ 4.741172] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055b6db0914f0 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 4.741183] RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000e [ 4.741193] R10: 0000000000000011 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b6db0854d0 [ 4.741204] R13: 000055b6db091150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055b6db035924 v2: Set dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled to true for all platforms other than vlv/chv that manually control the display power domain. Fixes: 19625e8 ("drm/i915: Enable polling when we don't have hpd") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170215131547.5064-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
t3hknr
pushed a commit
to t3hknr/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2017
…e enabled In order to prevent accessing the hpd registers outside of the display power wells, we should refrain from writing to the registers before the display interrupts are enabled. [ 4.740136] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:795 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740155] Unclaimed read from register 0x1e1110 [ 4.740168] Modules linked in: i915(+) intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers [ 4.740190] CPU: 1 PID: 221 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.10.0-rc6+ torvalds#384 [ 4.740203] Hardware name: / , BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0027.2015.0507.1758 05/07/2015 [ 4.740220] Call Trace: [ 4.740236] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6f [ 4.740251] __warn+0xc1/0xe0 [ 4.740265] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 [ 4.740281] ? insert_work+0x77/0xc0 [ 4.740355] ? fwtable_write32+0x90/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740431] __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740507] fwtable_read32+0xd8/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740575] i915_hpd_irq_setup+0xa5/0x100 [i915] [ 4.740649] intel_hpd_init+0x68/0x80 [i915] [ 4.740716] i915_driver_load+0xe19/0x1380 [i915] [ 4.740784] i915_pci_probe+0x32/0x90 [i915] [ 4.740799] pci_device_probe+0x8b/0xf0 [ 4.740815] driver_probe_device+0x2b6/0x450 [ 4.740828] __driver_attach+0xda/0xe0 [ 4.740841] ? driver_probe_device+0x450/0x450 [ 4.740853] bus_for_each_dev+0x5b/0x90 [ 4.740865] driver_attach+0x19/0x20 [ 4.740878] bus_add_driver+0x166/0x260 [ 4.740892] driver_register+0x5b/0xd0 [ 4.740906] ? 0xffffffffa0166000 [ 4.740920] __pci_register_driver+0x47/0x50 [ 4.740985] i915_init+0x5c/0x5e [i915] [ 4.740999] do_one_initcall+0x3e/0x160 [ 4.741015] ? __vunmap+0x7c/0xc0 [ 4.741029] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xcf/0x120 [ 4.741045] do_init_module+0x55/0x1c4 [ 4.741060] load_module+0x1f3f/0x25b0 [ 4.741073] ? __symbol_put+0x40/0x40 [ 4.741086] ? kernel_read_file+0x100/0x190 [ 4.741100] SYSC_finit_module+0xbc/0xf0 [ 4.741112] SyS_finit_module+0x9/0x10 [ 4.741125] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x17/0x98 [ 4.741135] RIP: 0033:0x7f8559a140f9 [ 4.741145] RSP: 002b:00007fff7509a3e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 4.741161] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f855aba02d1 RCX: 00007f8559a140f9 [ 4.741172] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055b6db0914f0 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 4.741183] RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000e [ 4.741193] R10: 0000000000000011 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b6db0854d0 [ 4.741204] R13: 000055b6db091150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055b6db035924 v2: Set dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled to true for all platforms other than vlv/chv that manually control the display power domain. Fixes: 19625e8 ("drm/i915: Enable polling when we don't have hpd") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170215131547.5064-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170313170231.18633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 262fd48) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
faxiang1230
pushed a commit
to faxiang1230/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2017
…e enabled commit 35a3abf upstream. In order to prevent accessing the hpd registers outside of the display power wells, we should refrain from writing to the registers before the display interrupts are enabled. [ 4.740136] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:795 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740155] Unclaimed read from register 0x1e1110 [ 4.740168] Modules linked in: i915(+) intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers [ 4.740190] CPU: 1 PID: 221 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.10.0-rc6+ torvalds#384 [ 4.740203] Hardware name: / , BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0027.2015.0507.1758 05/07/2015 [ 4.740220] Call Trace: [ 4.740236] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6f [ 4.740251] __warn+0xc1/0xe0 [ 4.740265] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 [ 4.740281] ? insert_work+0x77/0xc0 [ 4.740355] ? fwtable_write32+0x90/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740431] __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x44/0x50 [i915] [ 4.740507] fwtable_read32+0xd8/0x130 [i915] [ 4.740575] i915_hpd_irq_setup+0xa5/0x100 [i915] [ 4.740649] intel_hpd_init+0x68/0x80 [i915] [ 4.740716] i915_driver_load+0xe19/0x1380 [i915] [ 4.740784] i915_pci_probe+0x32/0x90 [i915] [ 4.740799] pci_device_probe+0x8b/0xf0 [ 4.740815] driver_probe_device+0x2b6/0x450 [ 4.740828] __driver_attach+0xda/0xe0 [ 4.740841] ? driver_probe_device+0x450/0x450 [ 4.740853] bus_for_each_dev+0x5b/0x90 [ 4.740865] driver_attach+0x19/0x20 [ 4.740878] bus_add_driver+0x166/0x260 [ 4.740892] driver_register+0x5b/0xd0 [ 4.740906] ? 0xffffffffa0166000 [ 4.740920] __pci_register_driver+0x47/0x50 [ 4.740985] i915_init+0x5c/0x5e [i915] [ 4.740999] do_one_initcall+0x3e/0x160 [ 4.741015] ? __vunmap+0x7c/0xc0 [ 4.741029] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xcf/0x120 [ 4.741045] do_init_module+0x55/0x1c4 [ 4.741060] load_module+0x1f3f/0x25b0 [ 4.741073] ? __symbol_put+0x40/0x40 [ 4.741086] ? kernel_read_file+0x100/0x190 [ 4.741100] SYSC_finit_module+0xbc/0xf0 [ 4.741112] SyS_finit_module+0x9/0x10 [ 4.741125] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x17/0x98 [ 4.741135] RIP: 0033:0x7f8559a140f9 [ 4.741145] RSP: 002b:00007fff7509a3e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 4.741161] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f855aba02d1 RCX: 00007f8559a140f9 [ 4.741172] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055b6db0914f0 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 4.741183] RBP: 0000000000020000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000e [ 4.741193] R10: 0000000000000011 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b6db0854d0 [ 4.741204] R13: 000055b6db091150 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055b6db035924 v2: Set dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled to true for all platforms other than vlv/chv that manually control the display power domain. Fixes: 19625e8 ("drm/i915: Enable polling when we don't have hpd") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170215131547.5064-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170313170231.18633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 262fd48) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2018
Scenario 1, ARMv7:
==================
If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer
the following may be generated:
00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>:
230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
232: b500 push {lr}
234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc>
234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc
238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0
238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc
23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180
FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230()
...
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1
...
[<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14)
[<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8)
[<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90)
[<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c)
[<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230)
[<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444)
[<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8)
[<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358)
[<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095)
---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]---
ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60
actual: 44:f2:e1:36
ftrace record flags: 0
(0) expected tramp: c03143e9
Scenario 2, ARMv4T:
===================
ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1
Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board
[<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c)
[<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30)
[<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104)
[<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c)
[<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310)
[<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4)
[<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410)
[<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null))
---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]---
ftrace failed to modify
[<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8
actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1
Initializing ftrace call sites
ftrace record flags: 0
(0)
expected tramp: c000fb24
The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously,
refer to the link below.
Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in
__mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl
script.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/
Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2019
Scenario 1, ARMv7
=================
If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer
the following may be generated:
00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>:
230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
232: b500 push {lr}
234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc>
234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc
238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0
238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc
23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180
FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230()
...
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1
...
[<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14)
[<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8)
[<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90)
[<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c)
[<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230)
[<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444)
[<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8)
[<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358)
[<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095)
---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]---
ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60
actual: 44:f2:e1:36
ftrace record flags: 0
(0) expected tramp: c03143e9
Scenario 2, ARMv4T
==================
ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1
Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board
[<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c)
[<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30)
[<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104)
[<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c)
[<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310)
[<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4)
[<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410)
[<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null))
---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]---
ftrace failed to modify
[<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8
actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1
Initializing ftrace call sites
ftrace record flags: 0
(0)
expected tramp: c000fb24
The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously,
refer to the link below.
Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in
__mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl
script.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/
Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2020
Scenario 1, ARMv7
=================
If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer
the following may be generated:
00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>:
230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
232: b500 push {lr}
234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc>
234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc
238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0
238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc
23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180
FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230()
...
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1
...
[<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14)
[<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8)
[<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90)
[<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c)
[<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230)
[<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444)
[<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8)
[<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358)
[<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095)
---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]---
ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60
actual: 44:f2:e1:36
ftrace record flags: 0
(0) expected tramp: c03143e9
Scenario 2, ARMv4T
==================
ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1
Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board
[<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c)
[<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30)
[<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104)
[<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c)
[<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310)
[<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4)
[<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410)
[<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null))
---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]---
ftrace failed to modify
[<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8
actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1
Initializing ftrace call sites
ftrace record flags: 0
(0)
expected tramp: c000fb24
The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously,
refer to the link below.
Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in
__mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl
script.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
ruscur
pushed a commit
to ruscur/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2020
Scenario 1, ARMv7
=================
If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer
the following may be generated:
00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>:
230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
232: b500 push {lr}
234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc>
234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc
238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0
238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc
23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180
FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230()
...
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1
...
[<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14)
[<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8)
[<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90)
[<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c)
[<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230)
[<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444)
[<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8)
[<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358)
[<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095)
---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]---
ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60
actual: 44:f2:e1:36
ftrace record flags: 0
(0) expected tramp: c03143e9
Scenario 2, ARMv4T
==================
ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1
Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board
[<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c)
[<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30)
[<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104)
[<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c)
[<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310)
[<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4)
[<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410)
[<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null))
---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]---
ftrace failed to modify
[<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8
actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1
Initializing ftrace call sites
ftrace record flags: 0
(0)
expected tramp: c000fb24
The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously,
refer to the link below.
Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in
__mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl
script.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2020
commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2020
commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2020
commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2020
commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
heftig
referenced
this pull request
in zen-kernel/zen-kernel
Jan 29, 2020
commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, #384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jackpot51
referenced
this pull request
in pop-os/linux
Mar 16, 2020
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864710 commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, #384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
jackpot51
referenced
this pull request
in pop-os/linux
Apr 13, 2020
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864710 commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, #384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
Noltari
pushed a commit
to Noltari/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2020
commit 927d780 upstream. Scenario 1, ARMv7 ================= If code in arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c would operate on mcount() pointer the following may be generated: 00000230 <prealloc_fixed_plts>: 230: b5f8 push {r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, lr} 232: b500 push {lr} 234: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc> 234: R_ARM_THM_CALL __gnu_mcount_nc 238: f240 0600 movw r6, #0 238: R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC __gnu_mcount_nc 23c: f8d0 1180 ldr.w r1, [r0, torvalds#384] ; 0x180 FTRACE currently is not able to deal with it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at .../kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1979 ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230() ... CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.116-... #1 ... [<c0314e3d>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c03115e9>] (show_stack+0x11/0x14) [<c03115e9>] (show_stack) from [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack+0x81/0xa8) [<c051a7f1>] (dump_stack) from [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x69/0x90) [<c0321c5d>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x17/0x1c) [<c0321cf3>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug+0x1ad/0x230) [<c038ee9d>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs+0x27d/0x444) [<c038f1f9>] (ftrace_process_locs) from [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init+0x91/0xe8) [<c08915bd>] (ftrace_init) from [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel+0x34b/0x358) [<c0885a67>] (start_kernel) from [<00308095>] (0x308095) ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c031266c>] prealloc_fixed_plts+0x8/0x60 actual: 44:f2:e1:36 ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c03143e9 Scenario 2, ARMv4T ================== ftrace: allocating 14435 entries in 43 pages ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2029 ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.5 #1 Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board [<c0010a24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x2c) [<c000ecb0>] (show_stack) from [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x30) [<c03c72e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0021c18>] (__warn+0xdc/0x104) [<c0021c18>] (__warn) from [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x4c/0x5c) [<c0021d7c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug+0x204/0x310) [<c0095360>] (ftrace_bug) from [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init+0x3b4/0x4d4) [<c04dabac>] (ftrace_init) from [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel+0x20c/0x410) [<c04cef4c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) ---[ end trace 0506a2f5dae6b341 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c000c350>] perf_trace_sys_exit+0x5c/0xe8 actual: 1e:ff:2f:e1 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c000fb24 The analysis for this problem has been already performed previously, refer to the link below. Fix the above problems by allowing only selected reloc types in __mcount_loc. The list itself comes from the legacy recordmcount.pl script. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/56961010.6000806@pengutronix.de/ Fixes: ed60453 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
TheSven73
pushed a commit
to TheSven73/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2021
Remove unnecessary section on the quickstart doc
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
PD#151224: driver defect clean up: torvalds#227 torvalds#238~239 torvalds#249 torvalds#257~258 torvalds#285~287 torvalds#384 torvalds#466~467 torvalds#472~474 torvalds#585 torvalds#655 torvalds#659~660 Change-Id: I241d863318a8754c0e7c5fa1155247d99a21eb9e Signed-off-by: KeLe Bai <kele.bai@amlogic.com>
kyak
pushed a commit
to kyak/linux-odroid
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2022
Update rtw_ap.c
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2024
There are so many "ENOTSUPP" (-524) errors when running BPF selftests on a Loongarch platform since lacking BPF trampoline on Loongarch: ''' test_d_path_basic:PASS:setup 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'prog_stat': failed to attach: unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'prog_stat': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_d_path_basic:FAIL:setup attach failed: -524 torvalds#77/1 d_path/basic:FAIL torvalds#77/2 d_path/check_rdonly_mem:OK torvalds#77/3 d_path/check_alloc_mem:OK torvalds#77 d_path:FAIL ... ... test_module_attach:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target_explicit 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to attach: unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_module_attach:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attach failed: -524 torvalds#167 module_attach:FAIL ... ... ringbuf_subtest:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:rw_cons_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:rw_extend 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_cons_pos_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_rw 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_prod_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_prod_pos_err 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_one 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_one_err 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_two 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_all 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_prod_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:write_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_remap 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_ro 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_prod_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:write_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_remap 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_ro 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ringbuf_create 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attachment failed: -1 torvalds#277/1 ringbuf/ringbuf:FAIL torvalds#277/2 ringbuf/ringbuf_n:SKIP torvalds#277/3 ringbuf/ringbuf_map_key:SKIP torvalds#277 ringbuf:FAIL ... ... test_test_bprm_opts:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'secure_exec': failed to attach: unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'secure_exec': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_test_bprm_opts:FAIL:attach attach failed: -524 torvalds#382 test_bprm_opts:FAIL ... ... test_test_ima:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_test_ima:PASS:ringbuf 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'bprm_committed_creds': failed to attach: \ unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'bprm_committed_creds': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_test_ima:FAIL:attach attach failed: -524 torvalds#384 test_ima:FAIL ... ... test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_pkt_md_access_new': failed to attach: \ unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'test_pkt_md_access_new': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_trace_ext:FAIL:setup freplace/test_pkt_md_access attach failed: -524 torvalds#397 trace_ext:FAIL ''' This patch uses ASSERT_OK() instead of CHECK() to skip these "ENOTSUPP" errors. With this change, the new output of these selftests look like: ''' torvalds#77/1 d_path/basic:SKIP torvalds#77/2 d_path/check_rdonly_mem:OK torvalds#77/3 d_path/check_alloc_mem:OK torvalds#77 d_path:OK (SKIP: 1/3) ... ... torvalds#167 module_attach:SKIP ... ... torvalds#277/1 ringbuf/ringbuf:SKIP torvalds#277/2 ringbuf/ringbuf_n:SKIP torvalds#277/3 ringbuf/ringbuf_map_key:SKIP torvalds#277 ringbuf:SKIP ... ... torvalds#382 test_bprm_opts:SKIP ... ... torvalds#384 test_ima:SKIP ... ... torvalds#397 trace_ext:SKIP ''' Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
There are so many "ENOTSUPP" (-524) errors when running BPF selftests on a Loongarch platform since lacking BPF trampoline on Loongarch: ''' test_d_path_basic:PASS:setup 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'prog_stat': failed to attach: unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'prog_stat': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_d_path_basic:FAIL:setup attach failed: -524 torvalds#77/1 d_path/basic:FAIL torvalds#77/2 d_path/check_rdonly_mem:OK torvalds#77/3 d_path/check_alloc_mem:OK torvalds#77 d_path:FAIL ... ... test_module_attach:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target_explicit 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to attach: unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_module_attach:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attach failed: -524 torvalds#167 module_attach:FAIL ... ... ringbuf_subtest:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:rw_cons_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:rw_extend 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_cons_pos_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_rw 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_prod_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_prod_pos_err 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_one 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_one_err 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_two 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:wr_data_page_all 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_prod_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:write_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_remap 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_ro 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_prod_pos 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:write_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:exec_protect 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ro_remap 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:unmap_ro 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:PASS:ringbuf_create 0 nsec ringbuf_subtest:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attachment failed: -1 torvalds#277/1 ringbuf/ringbuf:FAIL torvalds#277/2 ringbuf/ringbuf_n:SKIP torvalds#277/3 ringbuf/ringbuf_map_key:SKIP torvalds#277 ringbuf:FAIL ... ... test_test_bprm_opts:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'secure_exec': failed to attach: unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'secure_exec': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_test_bprm_opts:FAIL:attach attach failed: -524 torvalds#382 test_bprm_opts:FAIL ... ... test_test_ima:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_test_ima:PASS:ringbuf 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'bprm_committed_creds': failed to attach: \ unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'bprm_committed_creds': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_test_ima:FAIL:attach attach failed: -524 torvalds#384 test_ima:FAIL ... ... test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec test_trace_ext:PASS:setup 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_pkt_md_access_new': failed to attach: \ unknown error (-524) libbpf: prog 'test_pkt_md_access_new': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_trace_ext:FAIL:setup freplace/test_pkt_md_access attach failed: -524 torvalds#397 trace_ext:FAIL ''' This patch uses ASSERT_OK() instead of CHECK() to skip these "ENOTSUPP" errors. With this change, the new output of these selftests look like: ''' torvalds#77/1 d_path/basic:SKIP torvalds#77/2 d_path/check_rdonly_mem:OK torvalds#77/3 d_path/check_alloc_mem:OK torvalds#77 d_path:OK (SKIP: 1/3) ... ... torvalds#167 module_attach:SKIP ... ... torvalds#277/1 ringbuf/ringbuf:SKIP torvalds#277/2 ringbuf/ringbuf_n:SKIP torvalds#277/3 ringbuf/ringbuf_map_key:SKIP torvalds#277 ringbuf:SKIP ... ... torvalds#382 test_bprm_opts:SKIP ... ... torvalds#384 test_ima:SKIP ... ... torvalds#397 trace_ext:SKIP ''' Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
hbiyik
pushed a commit
to hbiyik/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2025
hbiyik
pushed a commit
to hbiyik/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2025
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2025
During OBEX Abort command, iOS may return an incomplete SDU packet which ends with the reply to the Abort command. During OBEX Abort command, iOS may return the L2CAP_SAR_END packet before the normal end of the SAR packets: < ACL Data TX: Handle 21 [2/8] flags 0x00 dlen 11 torvalds#194 [hci0] 14.923741 Channel: 3080 len 7 ctrl 0x060a [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Unsegmented TxSeq 5 ReqSeq 6 0a 06 ff 00 03 47 84 .....G. ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#382 [hci0] 19.701854 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0x460e [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Start (len 32767) TxSeq 7 ReqSeq 6 0e 46 ff 7f 90 7f ff 48 7f fc 43 48 41 52 53 45 .F.....H..CHARSE ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#383 [hci0] 19.701854 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#384 [hci0] 19.755918 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc610 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 8 ReqSeq 6 10 c6 6e 6f 73 61 69 72 65 73 64 65 73 69 67 6e ..nosairesdesign ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#385 [hci0] 19.775016 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#386 [hci0] 19.775024 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc612 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 9 ReqSeq 6 12 c6 69 63 6f 20 43 69 74 79 20 54 65 63 68 20 ..ico City Tech ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#387 [hci0] 19.775024 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#388 [hci0] 19.821542 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc614 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 10 ReqSeq 6 14 c6 6c 74 69 6e 67 20 50 61 72 74 6e 65 72 0d ..lting Partner. ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#389 [hci0] 19.821610 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#390 [hci0] 19.821610 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc616 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 11 ReqSeq 6 16 c6 6c 74 69 6e 67 2e 63 6f 6d 0d 0a 55 49 44 ..lting.com..UID ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 11 torvalds#391 [hci0] 19.821610 Channel: 65 len 7 ctrl 0x8618 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: End TxSeq 12 ReqSeq 6 18 86 a0 00 03 3e 5d .....>] < ACL Data TX: Handle 21 [1/8] flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#392 [hci0] 19.822491 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 10 len 4 Destination CID: 3080 Source CID: 65 In this case the re-assembled packet should be 32767 bytes as defined in Start packet (torvalds#382), i.e. 33 segmented packets, but the End packet is sent as the 6th packet. The l2cap_reassemble_sdu() function returns error -EINVAL if reassembled packet size != expected size, triggering the L2CAP disconnection, which disconnects the OBEX session, preventing further OBEX actions. Log this, discard previous segmented packet data and only send data from SAR End packet to upstream. Closes: bluez/bluetooth-next#17 Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis@collabora.com>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2025
During OBEX Abort command, iOS may return an incomplete SDU packet which ends with the reply to the Abort command. During OBEX Abort command, iOS may return the L2CAP_SAR_END packet before the normal end of the SAR packets: < ACL Data TX: Handle 21 [2/8] flags 0x00 dlen 11 torvalds#194 [hci0] 14.923741 Channel: 3080 len 7 ctrl 0x060a [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Unsegmented TxSeq 5 ReqSeq 6 0a 06 ff 00 03 47 84 .....G. ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#382 [hci0] 19.701854 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0x460e [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Start (len 32767) TxSeq 7 ReqSeq 6 0e 46 ff 7f 90 7f ff 48 7f fc 43 48 41 52 53 45 .F.....H..CHARSE ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#383 [hci0] 19.701854 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#384 [hci0] 19.755918 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc610 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 8 ReqSeq 6 10 c6 6e 6f 73 61 69 72 65 73 64 65 73 69 67 6e ..nosairesdesign ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#385 [hci0] 19.775016 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#386 [hci0] 19.775024 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc612 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 9 ReqSeq 6 12 c6 69 63 6f 20 43 69 74 79 20 54 65 63 68 20 ..ico City Tech ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#387 [hci0] 19.775024 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#388 [hci0] 19.821542 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc614 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 10 ReqSeq 6 14 c6 6c 74 69 6e 67 20 50 61 72 74 6e 65 72 0d ..lting Partner. ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 552 torvalds#389 [hci0] 19.821610 > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x01 dlen 458 torvalds#390 [hci0] 19.821610 Channel: 65 len 1006 ctrl 0xc616 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: Continuation TxSeq 11 ReqSeq 6 16 c6 6c 74 69 6e 67 2e 63 6f 6d 0d 0a 55 49 44 ..lting.com..UID ... > ACL Data RX: Handle 21 flags 0x02 dlen 11 torvalds#391 [hci0] 19.821610 Channel: 65 len 7 ctrl 0x8618 [PSM 4101 mode Enhanced Retransmission (0x03)] {chan 0} I-frame: End TxSeq 12 ReqSeq 6 18 86 a0 00 03 3e 5d .....>] < ACL Data TX: Handle 21 [1/8] flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#392 [hci0] 19.822491 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 10 len 4 Destination CID: 3080 Source CID: 65 In this case the re-assembled packet should be 32767 bytes as defined in Start packet (torvalds#382), i.e. 33 segmented packets, but the End packet is sent as the 6th packet. The l2cap_reassemble_sdu() function returns error -EINVAL if reassembled packet size != expected size, triggering the L2CAP disconnection, which disconnects the OBEX session, preventing further OBEX actions. Log this, discard previous segmented packet data and only send data from SAR End packet to upstream. Closes: bluez/bluetooth-next#17 Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis@collabora.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.