Skip to content
#

systematic-research

Here are 65 public repositories matching this topic...

The 3rd-place capstone allocator: CONVICTION / concentration / leverage over the keepers. Concentration underperforms risk parity risk-adjusted (+0.68/+0.72, deeper DD); only 1.5x levered risk-parity pays -- +16% CAGR but same Sharpe/M2 at -25% DD. Leverage buys return, not edge. For the bold, not the best. [Research]

  • Updated Aug 23, 2026
  • Python

Listed private-equity managers (BX/KKR/Apollo/Carlyle/Ares) — a levered pro-cyclical market/credit factor (beta-SPY 1.39, credit +1.55), not diversification. Governed live driver: PE-factor book + benchmark's market_regime overlay ON — first consumer sleeve to earn it (Sharpe +0.76→+0.95, DD −45%→−31%). [Live driver]

  • Updated Aug 21, 2026
  • Julia

The expanded capstone -- risk parity over the keepers PLUS the curated void-filling near-keepers (crypto/defensive/reversal). Curated breadth beats the pure book: +1.54 vs breakthrough +1.49 (2021-26), driven by the uncorrelated adds (crypto corr +0.35, reversal +0.14). Fill the voids that actually diversify. [Research]

  • Updated Aug 23, 2026
  • Python

The value factor & margin of safety — still crucial? Value LAGGED growth risk-adjusted (a different beta, not alpha), crashed HARDER (pure value -51% vs -37% — the safety folklore inverted), and is really a rate bet: value beats growth +12%/yr when rates rise, -12%/yr when they fall, but too coarse to beat the index net of cost. [Research]

  • Updated Aug 22, 2026
  • Python

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the systematic-research topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more