V3 mass upgrade #951

palfrey · 2025-09-07T08:54:58Z

Mass upgrade to v3 to fix #950

package/puzzles/package

Eeems · 2025-09-07T15:20:32Z

You chose v3.1 instead of v3.2 as it went to stable, which downgrades some packages. Since you are updating from v2 based images, it wouldn't matter as they would still mainly be upgraded. Let's use v3.2 instead so we can avoid the issues we swapped to stable to resolve.

palfrey · 2025-09-07T16:13:24Z

You chose v3.1 instead of v3.2 as it went to stable, which downgrades some packages. Since you are updating from v2 based images, it wouldn't matter as they would still mainly be upgraded. Let's use v3.2 instead so we can avoid the issues we swapped to stable to resolve.

Done

Eeems

All recipes that were changed will need their pkgver's rel (The number after the -) updated to trigger the package build.

palfrey · 2025-09-07T20:50:21Z

This also fixes #871 as a side-effect...

Eeems · 2025-09-07T21:28:56Z

We will need to get a new version of toltecmk pushed out to include upgrading to to resolve the build issues. It probably is worth just bumping absolutely everything when we do to make sure we didn't introduce any new issues. After we get the other PR merged I'll get the toltecmk version pushed, but it may be a bit. I'm not at home and mostly on mobile or a mobile hotspot

Eeems · 2025-09-08T04:03:20Z

0.3.5 should be released with your changes.

palfrey · 2025-09-08T20:02:55Z

scripts/repo_build.py

                        recipe_bundle[arch].packages[pkg_name]
                        for pkg_name in recipe_bundle[arch].packages
                    ]
+            logger.info("Building %s", name)


Made it possible to figure out what package was broken!

Not needed for 3.2

palfrey · 2025-09-08T23:01:11Z

Yay! With a small set of exceptions (folly, plato, retris) all of which have comments and links to their bug tickets, we have a working build with all the other 2.x packages on 3.x.

Eeems · 2025-09-09T03:46:54Z

I'll take a closer look and do some testing later this week.

LinusCDE · 2025-09-16T16:54:17Z

retris, chessmarkable, doomarkable and now plato all got new releases now (based on new libremarkable. features: 0.6.3 » MSRV bump: 0.7.0), so now they all build fine.

See respective releases (linked above) for more as some had the one or other small improvement added as well.

Also all support the env LIBREMARKABLE_FB_DISFAVOR_INTERNAL_RM2FB=1 now, to not use the builtin rm2fb client on the rM 2.

Should resolve:

Has broken rustc-serialize 0.3.24 LinusCDE/retris#3 (would also have happened on chessmarkabnle and doomarkable afaik)
Breaks with newer rust LinusCDE/plato#25

palfrey · 2025-09-18T21:57:20Z

Latest Chessmarkable certainly I can't build with v3.2, but that's a matter of the image being out of date! Logs I get are

[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): Downloaded moxcms v0.7.5
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): error: failed to parse manifest at `/root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/moxcms-0.7.5/Cargo.toml`
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build():
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): Caused by:
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): feature `edition2024` is required
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build():
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): The package requires the Cargo feature called `edition2024`, but that feature is not stabilized in this version of Cargo (1.83.0-nightly (c1fa840a8 2024-08-29)).
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): Consider trying a more recent nightly release.
[   DEBUG] toltec.builder: build(): See https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#edition-2024 for more information about the status of this feature.

palfrey · 2025-09-18T22:06:10Z

Same problem for retris and plato

palfrey · 2025-09-18T22:31:38Z

Tried deleting the Cargo.lock for those projects, and downgrading to the minimum versions, but you hit tomaka/hlua#226 (among other problems) when trying that.

LinusCDE · 2025-09-19T11:43:57Z

Odd. I was building with the 3.2 image.
But sometimes it seemed to want to update it. No clue how cross does it. Potentially it just bumped rust in that image to latest somehow.

And yeah, seems that going back with hlua would be hard, as before there were compilation errors due to the system library changing some function definitions.

palfrey · 2025-09-19T16:51:43Z

Odd. I was building with the 3.2 image. But sometimes it seemed to want to update it. No clue how cross does it. Potentially it just bumped rust in that image to latest somehow.

And yeah, seems that going back with hlua would be hard, as before there were compilation errors due to the system library changing some function definitions.

toltec-dev/toolchain#43 to get a newer rust with a 3.3 image appears to have sorted all of this out thankfully!

Eeems · 2025-09-19T17:31:29Z

Alright, we have them all building now this will take a while to test as there are quite a few packages, and will require testing on both OS 2.x and 3.x for both rM1 and rM2. If anybody wants to help, feel free to comment with what you've tested. We are only really looking for a quick install/uninstall test along with launching the app to make sure it runs and appears to perform it's basic functions. There is no need for an in depth test, although if you do that, make sure to raise any issues you find on the application's repository, unless it appears to be a packaging issue.

palfrey · 2025-09-20T15:03:25Z

I'm in progress testing things on my rm1 with OS 2.x, and will update this comment as I continue:

bash-completion - LGTM
bufshot - LGTM
calculator - LGTM
chessmarkable - LGTM
display - LGTM (stub installs fine)
doomarkable - LGTM
draft - LGTM
dumbskull - LGTM
evtest - LGTM
fbink - LGTM
fingerterm - LGTM
folly - LGTM
fuse - not sure how to test, installs fine
genie - LGTM
gocryptfs - runs, not really tested
harmony - LGTM
iago - runs, not really tested
keywriter - boots to blank screen (but I'm seeing this with the current version as well)
lamp - LGTM
libdlib - LGTM
libvncserver - LGTM given vnsee works
minesweeper - LGTM
mmc-utils - seems to run, not sure how tot est
nao - LGTM
netevent - LGTM
netsurf - LGTM
plato - LGTM
puzzles - LGTM
recrossable - LGTM
remarkable-splash - LGTM
remarkable-stylus - don't have the relevant hardware, installs fine
remux - LGTM
restream - LGTM
retris - LGTM
rmfakecloud-proxy - LGTM
rmservewacominput - boots, LGTM, not really tested
rpncalc - LGTM
sas - LGTM
templatectl
Installing this gets the following and it fails to install

Configuring templatectl.
//opt/lib/opkg/info/templatectl.postinst: line 998: warning: here-document at line 21 delimited by end-of-file (wanted `UNIT')
//opt/lib/opkg/info/templatectl.postinst: line 999: syntax error: unexpected end of file

This appears to be in add-bind-mount with the UNIT bit having been indented for some reason?
Not happening on the previous version

vnsee - LGTM
wikipedia - LGTM
wordlet - LGTM
zshelf - LGTM

So with the exception of templatectl having a weirdly borked postinst, all good here.

Eeems · 2025-09-20T17:56:54Z

display - is this rm1 relevant?

It's basically a stub on the rM1, but still relevant to test that it installs properly

palfrey · 2025-09-20T19:50:28Z

templatectl issue is a build bug, see toltec-dev/build#60

palfrey · 2025-09-20T22:26:39Z

templatectl install works all fine now

palfrey added 3 commits September 7, 2025 09:53

Mass upgrade to v3 images

08acce8

Upgrade examples as well

d8a5cf2

Fix some known wrong versions

6b47707

palfrey mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2025

Base 2.x can no longer be used for buiding #950

Open

Fix rmkit build

eca2af8

palfrey mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2025

Breaks with newer rust LinusCDE/plato#25

Open

Eeems reviewed Sep 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

package/puzzles/package Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

3.1 -> 3.2

ec69e6d

palfrey mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2025

Upgrade toolchain to v3 toltec-dev/build#59

Merged

Eeems requested changes Sep 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

palfrey added 2 commits September 7, 2025 18:33

Upgrade all the relevant pkgver's

ce6f433

Fix openssl build for netsurf

65e7f70

palfrey added 7 commits September 8, 2025 17:06

toltecmk 0.3.5

76beef8

Downgrade plato as it's broken

73f4d99

Log what we're building

7cb62b2

Upgrade folly clang versions

4a0bce1

Upgrade chessmarkable for rustc-serialize fix

2c52a5d

Upgrade doomarkable for rustc-serialize fix

52fd450

Downgrade retris

1bdd8f7

palfrey commented Sep 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

palfrey mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2025

Build seems to be broken bkirwi/folly#2

Open

palfrey added 2 commits September 8, 2025 23:00

Reset folly due to build issues

f3bbf47

Remove break-system-packages

e637a7f

Not needed for 3.2

palfrey mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2025

v4.x toltec-dev/toolchain#41

Open

palfrey mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2025

Bumping rust version toltec-dev/toolchain#43

Merged

Upgrade chessmarkable, retris, folly and plato

c81b050

toltecmk 0.3.7 for add-bind-mount fix

e7bc9ec

V3 mass upgrade #951

Are you sure you want to change the base?

V3 mass upgrade #951

Uh oh!

Conversation

palfrey commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Eeems commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

Eeems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

Eeems commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

Eeems commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey Sep 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

Eeems commented Sep 9, 2025

Uh oh!

LinusCDE commented Sep 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 18, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 18, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 18, 2025

Uh oh!

LinusCDE commented Sep 19, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 19, 2025

Uh oh!

Eeems commented Sep 19, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 20, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Eeems commented Sep 20, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 20, 2025

Uh oh!

palfrey commented Sep 20, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

LinusCDE commented Sep 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

palfrey commented Sep 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading