From 4e9b7f0a6ceec0275e22f5f1edac1daeb41f5033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Augspurger Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:18:40 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] doc update --- doc/source/extending.rst | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/source/extending.rst b/doc/source/extending.rst index da249cb3592f4..ab940384594bc 100644 --- a/doc/source/extending.rst +++ b/doc/source/extending.rst @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ your ``MyExtensionArray`` class, as follows: element one-by-one, this might not be as performant as implementing your own version of the associated operators directly on the ``ExtensionArray``. -This implementation will try to reconstruct a new ``ExtensionArray`` with the -result of the element-wise operation. Whether or not that succeeds depends on -whether the operation returns a result that's valid for the ``ExtensionArray``. -If an ``ExtensionArray`` cannot be reconstructed, a list containing the scalars -returned instead. +For arithmetic operations, this implementation will try to reconstruct a new +``ExtensionArray`` with the result of the element-wise operation. Whether +or not that succeeds depends on whether the operation returns a result +that's valid for the ``ExtensionArray``. If an ``ExtensionArray`` cannot +be reconstructed, an ndarray containing the scalars returned instead. .. _extending.extension.testing: