Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

LSP: USE should be used as separate steps #192

Closed
kape1395 opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #193
Closed

LSP: USE should be used as separate steps #192

kape1395 opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #193
Assignees
@kape1395

Comments

@kape1395
Copy link
Collaborator

kape1395 commented Jan 4, 2025

The USE statements produce proof obligations and thus should be shown as proof steps.
@kape1395 kape1395 self-assigned this Jan 4, 2025
@kape1395
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kape1395 commented Jan 4, 2025

The same applies to the USE in a module, not just a proof step.
The former is represented by the Mutate variant of the AST.

@kape1395 kape1395 mentioned this issue Jan 4, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kape1395 kape1395

Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

LSP: Create proof step markers for USE statements involving facts. tlaplus/tlapm
1 participant
@kape1395