You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This will be highlighted incorrectly with tree-sitter's highlighting implementation, although not nvim-treesitter's.
standalone_symbol_ref(<>_,_‼_,_^#)≜∧op(□,≺,^*)\* constant∧op(<>,‼,^#)\* parameter∧op(¬,⊆,⁺)\* defined operatorsymbol_scope_test≜∧<>(1)∧a‼b∧x^#
The -fix operators in symbol_scope_test will exhibit reference highlighting from the parameters in standalone_symbol_ref, even though they're out of scope. Strangely, adding an operator definition between the two operators fixes the problem; at least the issue is limited in scope. Uncertain whether this is a bug with the grammar or with how tree-sitter does highlighting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This will be highlighted incorrectly with tree-sitter's highlighting implementation, although not nvim-treesitter's.
The -fix operators in
symbol_scope_test
will exhibit reference highlighting from the parameters instandalone_symbol_ref
, even though they're out of scope. Strangely, adding an operator definition between the two operators fixes the problem; at least the issue is limited in scope. Uncertain whether this is a bug with the grammar or with how tree-sitter does highlighting.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: