You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The “System” menu keeps growing as we add new features. In Pro, the ”System” menu can contain up to 8 items:
(Note, “Logout” is conditional, i.e. only shown if user authentication is enabled.)
Before we add the next item to the “System” menu, we want to revisit the structure of it. We should also write up a few sentences as documentation, probably as comment somewhere in the <menu-bar> component.
Considerations
On a high-level, our menu(s) should be…:
Neat: the more items a menu contains, the harder it is for users to grasp its structure, and to find where things are.
There certainly is no hard limit in regards to items-per-menu, but 8 items on the same level (without any sort of grouping / division / sub-structure) feels quite a lot already.
Intuitive: the menu labels should be straightforward, and the menu structure should “feel” right – i.e., logical and consistent.
E.g., “System” implies “global”/“device-wide”, whereas “View” implies “local”/“client-side”. And “Actions” are operations against the target machine.
Practical: often-used items should be easy to reach, whereas less-used functionality can be “stashed away” somewhere.
One example here is the “About” menu item in the “Help” menu. You could argue whether that’s the right place, but the “About” dialog is really not that important in day-to-day usage, so it shouldn’t reside in “System” for example, to avoid clutter.
Some random notes for reference:
We mix items in the “System” menu that fall into slightly different categories. E.g., “Hostname” and “Virtual Media” are true properties of the device’s system, whereas e.g. “Log Out” is actually client-specific state, or “Update” is kind-of a meta functionality. We certainly don’t have to nail the semantics 100%, but maybe that realization helps us to think about the structure internally.
One constraint is that some items should stay in place for historical reasons. E.g., “Logs” could theoretically be moved somewhere else, but the problem is we’d have to change a lot of documentation and public support posts then.
Potential approaches to clear up the menu structure could be:
The “System” menu keeps growing as we add new features. In Pro, the ”System” menu can contain up to 8 items:
(Note, “Logout” is conditional, i.e. only shown if user authentication is enabled.)
Before we add the next item to the “System” menu, we want to revisit the structure of it. We should also write up a few sentences as documentation, probably as comment somewhere in the
<menu-bar>
component.Considerations
On a high-level, our menu(s) should be…:
Some random notes for reference:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: