You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It appears that tidypredict_fit() and tidypredict_sql() are returned a parsed model that has the Gaussian coefficients instead of the Binomial coefficients when a MARS model is fit using the earth package. The example below was done using R version 4.0.2, tidypredict_0.4.8 and earth_5.3.0. A comparison to parsed models using glm() is also included for reference.
mars.mod.2 <-
earth(
survived ~ age + sex,
data = etitanic,
glm = list(family = gaussian)
)
coef(mars.mod.2)
#> (Intercept) sexmale h(9-age)
#> 0.73782144 -0.54239536 0.02975461
The parsed model w/ binomial returns the Gaussian model coefficients with the Sigmoid function applied
It appears that tidypredict_fit() and tidypredict_sql() are returned a parsed model that has the Gaussian coefficients instead of the Binomial coefficients when a MARS model is fit using the earth package. The example below was done using R version 4.0.2, tidypredict_0.4.8 and earth_5.3.0. A comparison to parsed models using glm() is also included for reference.
MARS w/ Binomial
#> (Intercept) sexmale h(9-age)
#> 1.0499562 -2.4754699 0.1692326
MARS w/ Gaussian
#> (Intercept) sexmale h(9-age)
#> 0.73782144 -0.54239536 0.02975461
The parsed model w/ binomial returns the Gaussian model coefficients with the Sigmoid function applied
#> 1 - 1/(1 + exp(0.737821439264803 + (ifelse(age < 9, 9 - age,
#> 0) * 0.0297546135084789) + (ifelse(sex == "male", 1, 0) *
#> -0.542395361228247)))
#> 0.737821439264803 + (ifelse(age < 9, 9 - age, 0) * 0.0297546135084789) +
#> (ifelse(sex == "male", 1, 0) * -0.542395361228247)
Compare tidypredict with predict (fit and pred columns are not the same)
#> pclass survived sex age sibsp parch fit pred
#> 1 1st 1 female 29.0000 0 0 0.6765193 0.7407665
#> 2 1st 1 male 0.9167 1 2 0.6072916 0.4856151
#> 3 1st 0 female 2.0000 1 2 0.7203309 0.9033125
#> 4 1st 0 male 30.0000 1 2 0.5487016 0.1937987
#> 5 1st 0 female 25.0000 1 2 0.6765193 0.7407665
#> 6 1st 1 male 48.0000 0 0 0.5487016 0.1937987
#> 7 1st 1 female 63.0000 1 0 0.6765193 0.7407665
#> 8 1st 0 male 39.0000 0 0 0.5487016 0.1937987
#> 9 1st 1 female 53.0000 2 0 0.6765193 0.7407665
#> 10 1st 0 male 71.0000 0 0 0.5487016 0.1937987
Contrast with GLM
GLM w/ binomial
#> (Intercept) age sexmale
#> 1.235414162 -0.004254246 -2.460689180
GLM w/ Gaussian
#> (Intercept) age sexmale
#> 0.7734801846 -0.0007286511 -0.5460270483
Coefficients match GLM model 1 above
#> 1 - 1/(1 + exp(1.23541416209053 + (age * -0.00425424604207735) +
#> (ifelse(sex == "male", 1, 0) * -2.46068918004127)))
Coefficients match GLM model 2 above
#> 0.773480184644955 + (age * -0.000728651082406954) + (ifelse(sex ==
#> "male", 1, 0) * -0.546027048277061)
Compare predictions (fit and pred match)
#> pclass survived sex age sibsp parch fit pred
#> 1 1st 1 female 29.0000 0 0 0.7525094 0.7525094
#> 2 1st 1 male 0.9167 1 2 0.2263259 0.2263259
#> 3 1st 0 female 2.0000 1 2 0.7732765 0.7732765
#> 4 1st 0 male 30.0000 1 2 0.2053963 0.2053963
#> 5 1st 0 female 25.0000 1 2 0.7556650 0.7556650
#> 6 1st 1 male 48.0000 0 0 0.1931799 0.1931799
#> 7 1st 1 female 63.0000 1 0 0.7246003 0.7246003
#> 8 1st 0 male 39.0000 0 0 0.1992178 0.1992178
#> 9 1st 1 female 53.0000 2 0 0.7330082 0.7330082
#> 10 1st 0 male 71.0000 0 0 0.1783852 0.1783852
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: