chore(deps): update aspire to 9.5.1

[thomhurst]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
Aspire.AppHost.Sdk	msbuild-sdk	patch	9.5.0 -> 9.5.1
Aspire.Hosting.AppHost	nuget	patch	9.5.0 -> 9.5.1
Aspire.Hosting.Redis	nuget	patch	9.5.0 -> 9.5.1
Aspire.Hosting.Testing	nuget	patch	9.5.0 -> 9.5.1
Aspire.StackExchange.Redis.OutputCaching	nuget	patch	9.5.0 -> 9.5.1

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[claude]

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Aspire 9.5.1 Update

Reviewing this dependency update PR for code quality, security, performance, and potential issues.

Todo List:

• Read changed .csproj file to understand the exact updates
• Analyze the dependency changes for potential issues
• Check compatibility with TUnit project requirements
• Review for security, performance, and code quality implications
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

Changes Summary

The PR updates two Aspire packages in TUnit.Templates/content/TUnit.Aspire.Starter/ExampleNamespace.AppHost/ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:

• Aspire.AppHost.Sdk: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 3)
• Aspire.Hosting.AppHost: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 15)

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Good: Clean, minimal .csproj file structure
• Good: Proper use of modern .NET project SDK format
• Good: Enables nullable reference types and implicit usings
• Good: Targets .NET 9.0 which aligns with TUnit's modern approach

Potential Issues ⚠️

Inconsistent Package Versions:

• Aspire.Hosting.Redis remains at version 9.5.0 (line 16)
• While this doesn't break anything, it's generally better to keep all Aspire packages at the same version for consistency and compatibility
• Recommendation: Consider updating Aspire.Hosting.Redis to 9.5.1 as well if available

Performance Considerations ✅

• Low Risk: Patch version updates typically contain bug fixes and minor improvements
• Positive: Aspire 9.5.1 likely includes performance optimizations and bug fixes
• No Breaking Changes: Patch updates shouldn't introduce performance regressions

Security Concerns ✅

• Low Risk: Patch version updates often include security fixes
• Good Practice: Keeping dependencies up-to-date reduces security vulnerabilities
• No New Attack Surface: No new functionality or APIs introduced

Test Coverage 📝

• Template File: This is a project template, so direct unit testing isn't applicable
• Integration Testing: The template should be tested by creating projects from it
• Recommendation: Verify the template still works correctly after the update (likely handled by existing CI/CD)

Overall Assessment ✅

This is a low-risk, beneficial update that should be approved:

✅ Pros:

• Patch version with likely bug fixes and improvements
• Maintains compatibility with existing code
• Follows semantic versioning best practices
• Generated by trusted Renovate bot

⚠️ Minor Concern:

• Mixed Aspire package versions (9.5.1 and 9.5.0) - consider aligning all Aspire packages

Recommendation: Approve and merge this PR. Consider a follow-up to update Aspire.Hosting.Redis to 9.5.1 for version consistency.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Aspire 9.5.1 Update

Reviewing this dependency update PR for code quality, security, performance, and potential issues.

Todo List:

• Read changed .csproj files to understand the exact updates
• Analyze the dependency changes for potential issues
• Check compatibility with TUnit project requirements
• Review for security, performance, and code quality implications
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

Changes Summary

This PR updates five Aspire packages from version 9.5.0 to 9.5.1 across four template project files:

ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:

• Aspire.AppHost.Sdk: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 3)
• Aspire.Hosting.AppHost: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 15)
• Aspire.Hosting.Redis: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 16)

ExampleNamespace.TestProject.csproj:

• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 13)

ExampleNamespace.WebApp.csproj:

• Aspire.StackExchange.Redis.OutputCaching: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 10)

ExampleNamespace.csproj (Aspire.Test template):

• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 12)

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Good: Clean, modern .csproj file structure using SDK-style projects
• Good: Proper use of .NET 9.0 target framework aligning with TUnit's modern approach
• Good: Consistent package versioning across all Aspire packages (all at 9.5.1)
• Good: Enables nullable reference types and implicit usings following modern C# conventions
• Good: Template projects are well-structured with clear separation of concerns

Potential Issues & Considerations ⚠️

Low Risk, but Notable:

• Template Impact: These are project templates that developers use to create new TUnit+Aspire projects
• Breaking Changes: Patch versions should be safe, but Aspire is still evolving rapidly
• Integration Testing: Template functionality should be validated after updates

Performance Considerations ✅

• Positive Impact: Patch versions typically include performance optimizations and bug fixes
• Low Risk: No breaking API changes expected in patch updates
• Framework Alignment: Aspire 9.5.1 likely includes improvements for .NET 9.0 compatibility
• Testing Performance: The updated Aspire.Hosting.Testing package may have improved test execution performance

Security Concerns ✅

• Low Risk: Patch updates often include security fixes and vulnerability patches
• Good Practice: Keeping dependencies current reduces security attack surface
• No New Dependencies: No new packages introduced, only version bumps
• Trusted Source: Updates come from Microsoft's official Aspire packages

Test Coverage 📋

Template Validation Needed:

• Functional Testing: Templates should generate working projects
• Integration Testing: Aspire hosting and testing functionality should work correctly
• TUnit Compatibility: Ensure templates still integrate properly with TUnit test framework

Recommendations:

1. Template Testing: Verify that projects generated from these templates compile and run correctly
2. Integration Validation: Test that the Aspire hosting and testing features work as expected
3. CI Pipeline: Ensure existing CI validates template functionality

TUnit Compatibility Assessment ✅

Based on the CLAUDE.md guidelines:

• Performance First: ✅ Patch updates should maintain or improve performance
• Modern .NET: ✅ Templates target .NET 9.0, aligning with TUnit's modern approach
• AOT/Trimming: ✅ No changes that would impact AOT compatibility
• Testing Platform: ✅ Templates correctly use TUnit (not VSTest) for testing

Overall Assessment ✅

This is a low-risk, beneficial update that should be approved:

Strengths:

• Consistent patch-level update across all Aspire packages
• Maintains compatibility with existing template structure
• Follows semantic versioning best practices
• Generated by trusted Renovate Bot with proper automation
• Aligns with TUnit's commitment to modern, fast tooling

No Blocking Issues:

• No breaking changes expected
• No security vulnerabilities introduced
• No performance regressions anticipated
• Template structure remains clean and well-organized

Recommendation: ✅ Approve and merge this PR. The update is well-structured, low-risk, and maintains TUnit's commitment to modern, reliable tooling.

Follow-up Suggestion: Consider adding automated template validation to CI pipeline to catch any future template-breaking changes early.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Aspire 9.5.1 Update

Reviewing this dependency update PR for code quality, security, performance, and potential issues.

Todo List:

• Read changed .csproj files to understand the exact updates
• Analyze the dependency changes for potential issues
• Check compatibility with TUnit project requirements
• Review for security, performance, and code quality implications
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

Changes Summary

This PR updates five Aspire packages from version 9.5.0 to 9.5.1 across four template project files:

ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:

• Aspire.AppHost.Sdk: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 3)
• Aspire.Hosting.AppHost: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 15)
• Aspire.Hosting.Redis: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 16)

ExampleNamespace.TestProject.csproj:

• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 13)

ExampleNamespace.WebApp.csproj:

• Aspire.StackExchange.Redis.OutputCaching: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 10)

ExampleNamespace.csproj (Aspire.Test template):

• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 12)

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Good: Clean, modern .csproj file structure using SDK-style projects
• Good: Proper use of .NET 9.0 target framework aligning with TUnit's modern approach
• Good: Consistent package versioning across all Aspire packages (all at 9.5.1)
• Good: Enables nullable reference types and implicit usings following modern C# conventions
• Good: Template projects are well-structured with clear separation of concerns

Potential Issues & Considerations ⚠️

Low Risk, but Notable:

• Template Impact: These are project templates that developers use to create new TUnit+Aspire projects
• Breaking Changes: Patch versions should be safe, but Aspire is still evolving rapidly
• Integration Testing: Template functionality should be validated after updates

Performance Considerations ✅

• Positive Impact: Patch versions typically include performance optimizations and bug fixes
• Low Risk: No breaking API changes expected in patch updates
• Framework Alignment: Aspire 9.5.1 likely includes improvements for .NET 9.0 compatibility
• Testing Performance: The updated Aspire.Hosting.Testing package may have improved test execution performance

Security Concerns ✅

• Low Risk: Patch updates often include security fixes and vulnerability patches
• Good Practice: Keeping dependencies current reduces security attack surface
• No New Dependencies: No new packages introduced, only version bumps
• Trusted Source: Updates come from Microsoft's official Aspire packages

Test Coverage 📋

Template Validation Needed:

• Functional Testing: Templates should generate working projects
• Integration Testing: Aspire hosting and testing functionality should work correctly
• TUnit Compatibility: Ensure templates still integrate properly with TUnit test framework

Recommendations:

1. Template Testing: Verify that projects generated from these templates compile and run correctly
2. Integration Validation: Test that the Aspire hosting and testing features work as expected
3. CI Pipeline: Ensure existing CI validates template functionality

TUnit Compatibility Assessment ✅

Based on the CLAUDE.md guidelines:

• Performance First: ✅ Patch updates should maintain or improve performance
• Modern .NET: ✅ Templates target .NET 9.0, aligning with TUnit's modern approach
• AOT/Trimming: ✅ No changes that would impact AOT compatibility
• Testing Platform: ✅ Templates correctly use TUnit (not VSTest) for testing

Overall Assessment ✅

This is a low-risk, beneficial update that should be approved:

Strengths:

• Consistent patch-level update across all Aspire packages
• Maintains compatibility with existing template structure
• Follows semantic versioning best practices
• Generated by trusted Renovate Bot with proper automation
• Aligns with TUnit's commitment to modern, fast tooling

No Blocking Issues:

• No breaking changes expected
• No security vulnerabilities introduced
• No performance regressions anticipated
• Template structure remains clean and well-organized

Recommendation: ✅ Approve and merge this PR. The update is well-structured, low-risk, and maintains TUnit's commitment to modern, reliable tooling.

Follow-up Suggestion: Consider adding automated template validation to CI pipeline to catch any future template-breaking changes early.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Aspire 9.5.1 Update

Reviewing this dependency update PR for code quality, security, performance, and potential issues.

Todo List:

• Read changed .csproj files to understand the exact updates
• Analyze the dependency changes for potential issues
• Check compatibility with TUnit project requirements
• Review for security, performance, and code quality implications
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

Changes Summary

This PR updates five Aspire packages from version 9.5.0 to 9.5.1 across four template project files:

ExampleNamespace.AppHost.csproj:

• Aspire.AppHost.Sdk: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 3)
• Aspire.Hosting.AppHost: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 15)
• Aspire.Hosting.Redis: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 16)

ExampleNamespace.TestProject.csproj:

• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 13)

ExampleNamespace.WebApp.csproj:

• Aspire.StackExchange.Redis.OutputCaching: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 10)

ExampleNamespace.csproj (Aspire.Test template):

• Aspire.Hosting.Testing: 9.5.0 → 9.5.1 (line 12)

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Good: Clean, modern .csproj file structure using SDK-style projects
• Good: Proper use of .NET 9.0 target framework aligning with TUnit's modern approach
• Good: Consistent package versioning across all Aspire packages (all at 9.5.1)
• Good: Enables nullable reference types and implicit usings following modern C# conventions
• Good: Template projects are well-structured with clear separation of concerns

Potential Issues & Considerations ⚠️

Low Risk, but Notable:

• Template Impact: These are project templates that developers use to create new TUnit+Aspire projects
• Breaking Changes: Patch versions should be safe, but Aspire is still evolving rapidly
• Integration Testing: Template functionality should be validated after updates

Performance Considerations ✅

• Positive Impact: Patch versions typically include performance optimizations and bug fixes
• Low Risk: No breaking API changes expected in patch updates
• Framework Alignment: Aspire 9.5.1 likely includes improvements for .NET 9.0 compatibility
• Testing Performance: The updated Aspire.Hosting.Testing package may have improved test execution performance

Security Concerns ✅

• Low Risk: Patch updates often include security fixes and vulnerability patches
• Good Practice: Keeping dependencies current reduces security attack surface
• No New Dependencies: No new packages introduced, only version bumps
• Trusted Source: Updates come from Microsoft's official Aspire packages

Test Coverage 📋

Template Validation Needed:

• Functional Testing: Templates should generate working projects
• Integration Testing: Aspire hosting and testing functionality should work correctly
• TUnit Compatibility: Ensure templates still integrate properly with TUnit test framework

Recommendations:

1. Template Testing: Verify that projects generated from these templates compile and run correctly
2. Integration Validation: Test that the Aspire hosting and testing features work as expected
3. CI Pipeline: Ensure existing CI validates template functionality

TUnit Compatibility Assessment ✅

Based on the CLAUDE.md guidelines:

• Performance First: ✅ Patch updates should maintain or improve performance
• Modern .NET: ✅ Templates target .NET 9.0, aligning with TUnit's modern approach
• AOT/Trimming: ✅ No changes that would impact AOT compatibility
• Testing Platform: ✅ Templates correctly use TUnit (not VSTest) for testing

Overall Assessment ✅

This is a low-risk, beneficial update that should be approved:

Strengths:

• Consistent patch-level update across all Aspire packages
• Maintains compatibility with existing template structure
• Follows semantic versioning best practices
• Generated by trusted Renovate Bot with proper automation
• Aligns with TUnit's commitment to modern, fast tooling

No Blocking Issues:

• No breaking changes expected
• No security vulnerabilities introduced
• No performance regressions anticipated
• Template structure remains clean and well-organized

Recommendation: ✅ Approve and merge this PR. The update is well-structured, low-risk, and maintains TUnit's commitment to modern, reliable tooling.

Follow-up Suggestion: Consider adding automated template validation to CI pipeline to catch any future template-breaking changes early.

---