Using TUnit as a runner for Playwright? Anything special that should be considered? #622
turbobobbytraykov
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
|
I did raise this on their GitHub but they want the package to be more popular first: microsoft/playwright-dotnet#3007 I could recreate their logic and make my own package though. So I'll keep this issue open and see if I can find time for it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
|
@thomhurst Is there any documentation for this TUnit and Playwright? The Web example also does not have it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
@thomhurst How can I start with headless = false? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I know it may be a silly question to ask, but given Playwright's current documentation on supported test runners , I was wondering it the Microsoft Test(ing) Platform (Protocol)/testfx/mttp/mtp or TUnit would expose any official integration with Playwright?
From what I can see, it's that MSTest & NUnit have integration in terms of settings for Playwright's browser instance(s) as well as a PageContext and BrowserContext helper classes.
OFFTOPIC: The "Microsoft Test(ing) Platform (Protocol)" has so many naming variations that it took me a boat-load of time to get lost where to look for details, other than asking the Amaury Leve on Twitter. 😄
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions