Skip to content

Support for new for EIP-1271 verification #572

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 15 additions & 2 deletions contracts/prebuilts/account/non-upgradeable/Account.sol
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ contract Account is AccountCore, ContractMetadata, ERC1271, ERC721Holder, ERC115
using ECDSA for bytes32;
using EnumerableSet for EnumerableSet.AddressSet;

bytes32 private constant MSG_TYPEHASH = keccak256("AccountMessage(bytes message)");

/*///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Constructor, Initializer, Modifiers
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -61,14 +63,15 @@ contract Account is AccountCore, ContractMetadata, ERC1271, ERC721Holder, ERC115
}

/// @notice See EIP-1271
function isValidSignature(bytes32 _hash, bytes memory _signature)
function isValidSignature(bytes32 _message, bytes memory _signature)
public
view
virtual
override
returns (bytes4 magicValue)
{
address signer = _hash.recover(_signature);
bytes32 messageHash = getMessageHash(abi.encode(_message));
address signer = messageHash.recover(_signature);

if (isAdmin(signer)) {
return MAGICVALUE;
Expand All @@ -87,6 +90,16 @@ contract Account is AccountCore, ContractMetadata, ERC1271, ERC721Holder, ERC115
}
}

/**
* @notice Returns the hash of message that should be signed for EIP1271 verification.
* @param message Message to be hashed i.e. `keccak256(abi.encode(data))`
* @return Hashed message
*/
function getMessageHash(bytes memory message) public view returns (bytes32) {
bytes32 messageHash = keccak256(abi.encode(MSG_TYPEHASH, keccak256(message)));
return keccak256(abi.encodePacked("\x19\x01", _domainSeparatorV4(), messageHash));
}

/*///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
External functions
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/
Expand Down
17 changes: 15 additions & 2 deletions contracts/prebuilts/account/utils/AccountExtension.sol
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ contract AccountExtension is ContractMetadata, ERC1271, AccountPermissions, ERC7
using ECDSA for bytes32;
using EnumerableSet for EnumerableSet.AddressSet;

bytes32 private constant MSG_TYPEHASH = keccak256("AccountMessage(bytes message)");

/*///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Constructor, Initializer, Modifiers
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -63,14 +65,15 @@ contract AccountExtension is ContractMetadata, ERC1271, AccountPermissions, ERC7
}

/// @notice See EIP-1271
function isValidSignature(bytes32 _hash, bytes memory _signature)
function isValidSignature(bytes32 _message, bytes memory _signature)
public
view
virtual
override
returns (bytes4 magicValue)
{
address signer = _hash.recover(_signature);
bytes32 messageHash = getMessageHash(abi.encode(_message));
address signer = messageHash.recover(_signature);

if (isAdmin(signer)) {
return MAGICVALUE;
Expand All @@ -89,6 +92,16 @@ contract AccountExtension is ContractMetadata, ERC1271, AccountPermissions, ERC7
}
}

/**
* @notice Returns the hash of message that should be signed for EIP1271 verification.
* @param message Message to be hashed i.e. `keccak256(abi.encode(data))`
* @return Hashed message
*/
function getMessageHash(bytes memory message) public view returns (bytes32) {
bytes32 messageHash = keccak256(abi.encode(MSG_TYPEHASH, keccak256(message)));
return keccak256(abi.encodePacked("\x19\x01", _domainSeparatorV4(), messageHash));
}

/*///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
External functions
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/
Expand Down
35 changes: 31 additions & 4 deletions src/test/smart-wallet/AccountVulnPOC.t.sol
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import { TWProxy } from "contracts/infra/TWProxy.sol";

// Target
import { IAccountPermissions } from "contracts/extension/interface/IAccountPermissions.sol";
import { AccountFactory, Account } from "contracts/prebuilts/account/non-upgradeable/AccountFactory.sol";
import { AccountFactory, Account as SimpleAccount } from "contracts/prebuilts/account/non-upgradeable/AccountFactory.sol";

library GPv2EIP1271 {
bytes4 internal constant MAGICVALUE = 0x1626ba7e;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ contract SimpleAccountVulnPOCTest is BaseTest {
/*//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Setup
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/
address account = accountFactory.getAddress(accountAdmin, bytes(""));

address[] memory approvedTargets = new address[](1);
approvedTargets[0] = address(0x123); // allowing accountSigner permissions for some random contract, consider it as 0 address here

Expand All @@ -270,7 +272,6 @@ contract SimpleAccountVulnPOCTest is BaseTest {

vm.prank(accountAdmin);
bytes memory sig = _signSignerPermissionRequest(permissionsReq);
address account = accountFactory.getAddress(accountAdmin, bytes(""));
IAccountPermissions(payable(account)).setPermissionsForSigner(permissionsReq, sig);

// As expected, Account Signer is not be able to call setNum on numberContract since it doesnt have numberContract as approved target
Expand All @@ -292,14 +293,40 @@ contract SimpleAccountVulnPOCTest is BaseTest {
Attack
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/

//However they can bypass this by using signature verification on number contract instead
// However they can bypass this by using signature verification on number contract instead
vm.prank(accountSigner);
bytes32 digest = keccak256(abi.encode(42));
(uint8 v, bytes32 r, bytes32 s) = vm.sign(accountSignerPKey, digest);
bytes32 toSign = SimpleAccount(payable(account)).getMessageHash(abi.encode(digest));
(uint8 v, bytes32 r, bytes32 s) = vm.sign(accountSignerPKey, toSign);
bytes memory signature = abi.encodePacked(r, s, v);

vm.expectRevert("Account: caller not approved target.");
numberContract.setNumBySignature(account, 42, signature);
assertEq(numberContract.num(), 0);

// Signer can perform transaction if target is approved.
address[] memory newApprovedTargets = new address[](2);
newApprovedTargets[0] = address(0x123); // allowing accountSigner permissions for some random contract, consider it as 0 address here
newApprovedTargets[1] = address(numberContract);

IAccountPermissions.SignerPermissionRequest memory updatedPermissionsReq = IAccountPermissions
.SignerPermissionRequest(
accountSigner,
0,
newApprovedTargets,
1 ether,
0,
type(uint128).max,
0,
type(uint128).max,
bytes32("another UID")
);

vm.prank(accountAdmin);
bytes memory sig2 = _signSignerPermissionRequest(updatedPermissionsReq);
IAccountPermissions(payable(account)).setPermissionsForSigner(updatedPermissionsReq, sig2);

numberContract.setNumBySignature(account, 42, signature);
assertEq(numberContract.num(), 42);
}
}