forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
ASoC: SOF: topology: add pm-get/put around topology load #241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@plbossart this seems to take care of the error. But if we are using autosuspend, shouldnt we use
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(sdev->dev);
ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(sdev->dev);
On the other hand, instead of this patch what also works is:S ince we are enabling autosuspend on component->dev, we should use runtime_put_autosuspend instead of runtime_idle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ranj063 I edited your comment to format the patch contents with the 4 backquotes thingy
I am not sure I understand the proposal above at all, where is the pm_runtime_get_ done prior to calling snd_sof_topology_load?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@plbossart from my observations, I dont think the sof device enter runtime suspend before topology loading occurs.
in pcm.c after topology loading in completed, we enable runtime_pm_enable and use autosuspend for component->dev. And then we call pm_runtime_idle(). This seems to be what is causing the error.
What I was suggesting was that instead of calling pm_runtime_idle, we should use put_autosuspend instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ranj063 My understanding is that for every pm_runtime_put_xxx you need to have a matching pm_runtime_get_xxx. I don't get how we can use put_autosuspend() without a prior get(). What am I missing?