-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix element role in NavLi #1484
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@LahTeuto is attempting to deploy a commit to the Themesberg Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@LahTeuto has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve a modification to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/lib/navbar/NavLi.svelte
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lib/navbar/NavLi.svelte (1)
34-34
: Verify keyboard navigation behavior
Since this is a navigation component, we should ensure it maintains proper keyboard navigation functionality.
Let's check for keyboard event handling in related components:
✅ Verification successful
Keyboard navigation implementation is properly handled
The component has appropriate keyboard event handlers and accessibility attributes:
- Implements all necessary keyboard events (
keydown
,keypress
,keyup
) - Correctly sets
role="link"
for anchor elements - Properly forwards all events via
$$restProps
- Works in conjunction with other navbar components that also implement proper ARIA roles (e.g.,
role="button"
withtabindex="0"
)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for keyboard navigation handling in navbar components
# Look for keyboard event handlers in navbar components
echo "Checking for keyboard navigation handlers in navbar components..."
rg -t svelte "on:key" src/lib/navbar/
# Look for accessibility-related tests
echo "Checking for accessibility tests..."
rg -t ts -t js "describe.*accessibility|test.*keyboard|it.*navigate" tests/
Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check keyboard navigation handling
# Check for keyboard event bindings in NavLi.svelte and related components
echo "Checking keyboard events in navbar components..."
rg "on:(keydown|keyup|keypress)" src/lib/navbar/
# Check for ARIA attributes and roles
echo "Checking ARIA attributes and roles..."
rg "role=|aria-" src/lib/navbar/
# Look for test files related to navbar
echo "Looking for navbar test files..."
fd "nav.*\.(spec|test)\.(js|ts|svelte)" tests/
Length of output: 1281
src/lib/navbar/NavLi.svelte
Outdated
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ | |||
</script> | |||
|
|||
<li> | |||
<svelte:element this={href ? 'a' : 'div'} role={href ? undefined : 'link'} {href} {...$$restProps} on:blur on:change on:click on:focus on:keydown on:keypress on:keyup on:mouseenter on:mouseleave on:mouseover class={liClass}> | |||
<svelte:element this={href ? 'a' : 'div'} role={href ? 'link' : undefined} {href} {...$$restProps} on:blur on:change on:click on:focus on:keydown on:keypress on:keyup on:mouseenter on:mouseleave on:mouseover class={liClass}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
The role attribute change needs refinement
While the intention to improve accessibility is good, setting role="link"
on an <a>
element is redundant as anchor elements have an implicit link role. Additionally, we should consider adding more ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
Consider this implementation:
- <svelte:element this={href ? 'a' : 'div'} role={href ? 'link' : undefined} {href} {...$$restProps} on:blur on:change on:click on:focus on:keydown on:keypress on:keyup on:mouseenter on:mouseleave on:mouseover class={liClass}>
+ <svelte:element
+ this={href ? 'a' : 'div'}
+ role={href ? undefined : 'presentation'}
+ aria-current={active ? 'page' : undefined}
+ {href}
+ {...$$restProps}
+ on:blur
+ on:change
+ on:click
+ on:focus
+ on:keydown
+ on:keypress
+ on:keyup
+ on:mouseenter
+ on:mouseleave
+ on:mouseover
+ class={liClass}>
Changes explained:
- Removed redundant
role="link"
on anchor elements - Added
role="presentation"
for div elements to indicate they're for layout - Added
aria-current="page"
when the item is active - Improved code readability with multi-line formatting
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Setting the presentation
role exactly like suggested would remove the link
role again, which would not improve aria role coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LahTeuto, thank you for the clarification. You're absolutely right—setting role="presentation"
would remove the link
role and not improve ARIA role coverage. My apologies for the oversight.
I'll take this into account for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: LahTeuto
PR: themesberg/flowbite-svelte#1484
File: src/lib/navbar/NavLi.svelte:34-34
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:36:34.590Z
Learning: When enhancing ARIA roles in Svelte components, avoid setting `role="presentation"` on elements that should retain the `link` role, as it can diminish ARIA role coverage and negatively affect accessibility.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
📑 Description
This fixes a wrong aria role on the NavLi component resulting from a mixed up ternary operator.
Status
✅ Checks
ℹ Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit